Page 116 - Read Online
P. 116

Jiao et al. Art Int Surg 2023;3:98-110  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2023.03                                                              Page 108


































                Figure 4. Incisions for extraction and port positioning for pancreatoduodenectomy using the Vinci Xi/X with arms 1 and 4 replaced with
                FG18 Robinson’s drains.

                                                                          [17]
               our series. We had a bile leak rate of 6.3% in our first reported series , all managed conservatively, which
               had reduced significantly to 2.1% after 100 RPD cases. The oncological outcome following RPD based on R
               status and the number of lymph nodes harvested showed an R0 resection rate of 89.24% ± 11.95% with a
               mean tumor size of 25.62 ± 3.50 mm and an average number of resected lymph nodes of 22.47 ± 10.37
                         [17]
               respectively , more than the 15 recommended by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) .
                                                                                                      [21]
               ROBOTICS HPB SURGERY AND AI
               There is little doubt that the future of surgery will be minimally invasive to avoid major trauma to patients
               for faster recovery, which will inevitably offset the cost of robotic surgery. Advances in technology will
               enable us to achieve this with the precision of robotic instruments and improved ergonomics leading
                                                                                   [22]
               inevitably to the development of haptic feedback and artificial intelligence . Through robotic data
               acquisition, it will be much faster for machine learning and deep learning to develop the next generation of
               intelligent surgical robots to personalize surgical plans and procedures, reducing intraoperative errors and
               standardizing complex operations such as PD. Furthermore, with AI, performance metrics can be applied to
               future clinical practice to be used as competency tools to assess the performance and quality of a surgeon’s
               skills rather than conventional morbidity and mortality data . Robotic and AI training should be
                                                                       [23]
               embedded in the surgical training curriculum for the future generation of surgeons to benefit patients
               directly and also to encourage research collaboration for developing future intelligent robotic surgery.


               Robotic surgery is a safe approach for patients requiring PD, and it may offer advantages over both open
               and laparoscopic surgery. However, randomized controlled trials are still required to prove this. Notably,
               the superiority of performing either a pancreaticogastrostomy or Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy has
               never been shown in the open pancreatic surgical literature ; as a result, it is doubtful that future will be
                                                                  [24]
               able to show the superiority of either anastomosis in the robotic literature. Perhaps the most promising
               advantage of current robotic surgery will be its ability to incorporate more artificial intelligence in the
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121