Page 445 - Read Online
P. 445

Page 8 of 9                                              Ghoneim et al. Vessel Plus 2020;4:38  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2020.35

               statistically significant higher size of IIA in the IIA sacrifice group. We did not perform quality of life and
               subgroup analysis with unilateral and bilateral IIA coverage. Furthermore, the lack of standardized way to
               assess erectile dysfunction and buttock claudication might be responsible for the lower erectile dysfunction
               and buttock claudication mentioned in the current study.

               In conclusion, Although the IIA sacrifice group had higher total hospital and high dependency unit
               stay, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications, three-year freedom from
               reintervention and aneurysm-related as well as overall survival. Based on our experience, the coverage
               of IIA aneurysmal extension during endovascular repair of the aortoiliac aneurysmal disease seems
               technically feasible and safe.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Concept and design: Ghoneim B, Tawfick W, Sultan S
               Analysis and interpretation, writing the article, critical revision and final approval of the article, overall
               responsibility: Ghoneim B, Canning P, Acharya Y, Hynes N, Tawfick W, Sultan S
               Data collection: Ghoneim B, Canning P, Acharya Y
               Statistical analysis: Ghoneim B, Canning P, Acharya Y, Tawfick W

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The study is approved by the Galway Clinical Research Ethics Committee (C.A. 1210, 13/02/2015).


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Hosaka A, Kato M, Kato I, Isshiki S, Okubo N. Outcome after concomitant unilateral embolization of the internal iliac artery and
                   contralateral external-to-internal iliac artery bypass grafting during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:960-4.
               2.   Armon M, Wenham P, Whitaker S, Gregson R, Hopkinson B. Common iliac artery aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic
                   aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998;15:255-7.
               3.   Albertini JN, Favre JP, Bouziane Z, Haase C, Nourrissat G, Barral X. Aneurysmal extension to the iliac bifurcation increases the risk of
                   complications and secondary procedures after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2010;24:663-9.
               4.   Lee WA, Nelson PR, Berceli SA, Seeger JM, Huber TS. Outcome after hypogastric artery bypass and embolization during endovascular
                   aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:1162-8; discussion 1168-9.
               5.   Machado RM, Rego DN, de Oliveira PNFP, de Almeida RMGF. Endovascular treatment of internal iliac artery aneurysms: single center
                   experience. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2016;31:127-31.
               6.   Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al; Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The
                   Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J
                   Vasc Surg 2002;35:1048-60.
   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450