Page 294 - Read Online
P. 294

Zimmermann et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:31  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.010                                        Page 7 of 18































                        Figure 4. St Jude Amplatzer Device, reproduced under creative commons license, Thomson and Quereshi 2015

               approaches. Two such case reports technical success with correcting partial anomalous pulmonary venous
               return of the right upper pulmonary vein by deploying a covered stent graft into the affected pulmonary
                                    [56]
               vein [54,55] . Abdullah et al.  describe an approach that combines covered stent grafts and occlusion devices
               to correct sinus venosus defects successfully in four patients; of which two required re-intervention with an
               additional covered stent or PFO closure device, but all without significant complications at the 12-month
                             [56]
               follow-up point . Others have reported success with the immediate release patch, which has been under
               investigation in translational animal studies as a potential alternative to metallic devices [57,58] .

               Transcatheter devices available today for closure of secundum ASDs
               The origins of transcatheter ASD repair can be traced back to King’s report of non-operative ASD closure
                                               [59]
               during cardiac catheterization in 1976 . Formal development of a device for ASD, however, is attributed to
                                                                                       [60]
               the Atrial Septal Defect Occluding System (ASDOS) submitted by Babic et al in 1990 . Though successive
               iterations made the device more user friendly and showed early promise, the ASDOS was abandoned in
               2001 with the development of newer generations of transcatheter devices. A history of transcatheter device
               evolution has been detailed by Nassif et al. . Today, transcatheter ASD closure is associated with low
                                                     [61]
               complications, short duration anesthesia, short hospital stay, and well documented long-term symptom
               follow up [62-64] . Transcatheter ASD closure is now considered the first choice of treatment as opposed to
               surgical intervention. The most widely employed device worldwide, and one of two FDA approved devices
               for use in North America is the Amplazer device, shown in Figure 4. Echocardiography, either ICE or TEE
               play a considerable role in the guidance of these procedures and in further assessment of the final results.
               Areas of active research focus on examining other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging
               or computed tomography to construct 3D topographical visualizations of the heart and associated defects
               prior to transcatheter ASD closure [65-69] . A review of recent publications describing the outcomes and
               population size of the respective studies are listed in Table 1, including devices otherwise available outside
               of the United States.

               ASD characteristics amenable for percutaneous closure
               Two crucial parameters should be evaluated in patients with secundum septal defect prior to intervention:
               maximal ASD and surrounding rim dimensions. Presently, the Amplatzer device is capable of closing
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299