Page 266 - Read Online
P. 266

Gacad et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:28  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.011                                                   Page 9 of 10

                   (ISAR-CABG): a randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 2011;378:1071-8.
               41.  Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Burke MN. A new treatment strategy for saphenous vein graft lesions?: Letting it Go. J Am Coll Cardiol
                   2018;71:1983-5.
               42.  Gaudino M, Antoniades C, Benedetto U, Deb S, Di Franco A, et al. Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft
                   failure. Circulation 2017;136:1749-64.
               43.  Avgerinos DV, Charitakis K. Hybrid coronary revascularization: present and future. Hellenic J Cardiol 2015;56:193-6.
               44.  Davies MJ. The pathology of myocardial ischaemia. J Clin Pathol Suppl (R Coll Pathol) 1977;11:45-52.
               45.  Puskas JD, Halkos ME, DeRose JJ, Bagiella E, Miller MA, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel
                   coronary artery disease: a multicenter observational study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:356-65.
               46.  Otsuka F, Yahagi K, Sakakura K, Virmani R. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Ann
                   Cardiothorac Surg 2013;2:519-26.
               47.  Zhang M, Guddeti RR, Matsuzawa Y, Sara JD, Kwon TG, et al. Left internal mammary artery versus coronary stents: impact on
                   downstream coronary stenoses and conduit patency. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5.
               48.  Kitamura S. Physiological and metabolic effects of grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery. Circ J 2011;75:766-72.
               49.  ElBardissi AW, Aranki SF, Sheng S, O’Brien SM, Greenberg CC, et al. Trends in isolated coronary artery bypassgrafting: an analysis of
                   the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:273-81.
               50.  Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Reitz BA, Shilane DA, Baker LC, et al. Adoption and effectiveness of internal mammary artery grafting in
                   coronary artery bypass surgery among Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:33-9.
               51.  Tabata M, Grab JD, Khalpey Z, Edwards FH, O’Brien SM, et al. Prevalence and variability of internal mammary artery graft use in
                   contemporary multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database.
                   Circulation 2009;120:935-40.
               52.  Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, Hambrecht R, Spyrantis N, et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for
                   stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:561-6.
               53.  Bhatt DL. CABG the clear choice for patients with diabetes and multivessel disease. Lancet 2018;391:913-4.
               54.  Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, Lytle BW, Gill CC, Golding LA, et al. Predictors of reoperation after myocardial revascularization. J Thorac
                   Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:811-21.
               55.  Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, Ahn JM, Boersma E, et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous
                   coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2018;391:939-48.
               56.  Farooq V, Serruys PW, Zhang Y, Mack M, Ståhle E, et al. Short-term and long-term clinical impact of stent thrombosis and graft
                   occlusion in the SYNTAX trial at 5 years: synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial. J
                   Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:2360-9.
               57.  Cassese S, Piccolo R, Galasso G, De Rosa R, Piscione F. Twelve-month clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent as compared
                   to paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. A meta-analysis of randomized
                   clinical trials. Int J Cardiol 2011;150:84-9.
               58.  Onuma Y, Miquel-Hebert K, Serruys PW, Investigators SI. Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-
                   eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention
                   2013;8:1047-51.
               59.  Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the
                   American Heart Association. Circulation 2016;133:e38-360.
               60.  Pi Y, Roe MT, Holmes DN. Utilization, Characteristics, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With
                   ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and
                   Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017;10.
               61.  Deeik RK, Schmitt TM, Ihrig TG, Sugimoto JT. Appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute
                   myocardial infarction. Am J Surg 1998;176:581-5.
               62.  Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, Ting W. Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction. J
                   Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:115-9; discussion 119.
               63.  Parikh SV, de Lemos JA, Jessen ME, Brilakis ES, Ohman EM, et al. Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for
                   non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-
                   GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines). JACC Cardiovasc Interv
                   2010;3:419-27.
               64.  Thomas MP, Bates ER. Update on primary PCI for patients with STEMI. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2017;27:95-102.
               65.  Chang M, Lee CW, Ahn JM, Cavalcante R, Sotomi Y, et al. Comparison of outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-
                   eluting stent implantation for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2017;120:380-6.
               66.  Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, Helqvist S, Høfsten DE, Kløvgaard L, et al. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion
                   only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI): an open-label,
                   randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:665-71.
               67.  Zimarino M, Ricci F, Romanello M, Di Nicola M, Corazzini A, et al. Complete myocardial revascularization confers a larger clinical
                   benefit when performed with state-of-the-art techniques in high-risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
                   of randomized and observational studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;87:3-12.
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271