Page 254 - Read Online
P. 254

Page 6 of 9                                                         Lam et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:27  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.009
































               Figure 2. Forest plot for weighted mean differences (days) of length of stay for TTE-TAVI in comparison to TEE-TAVI with subgroups
               based on study type. TTE: transthoracic echocardiography; TEE: transesophageal echocardiography; MD: mean difference; CI: confidence
               interval; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation


               Post hoc  analyses
               Any PVL rates between TTE-TAVI and TEE-TAVI were compared in a subgroup analysis of MAC groups
               that only used TTE vs. MAC groups that had mixed TTE and TEE usage. There were 909 patients in the
               100% TTE group and 755 patients in the mixed group. In the mixed echocardiography usage group, the
               mean use of TTE in the TAVI with MAC group was 50.0%. There were similar crude rates of PVL between
               the 100% TTE group compared to the mixed echocardiography usage group (18.4% vs. 21.4%). There
               were no significant differences of PVL between the 100% TTE group (RR: 1.00, 95%CI: 0.79 to 1.26, P =
               0.98) and mixed echocardiography group (RR: 1.15, 95%CI: 0.84 to 1.57, P = 0.39, interaction P = 0.49)
               [Supplementary Figure 13].


               DISCUSSION
               This is the first meta-analysis using method of anesthesia to infer TTE and TEE status in conjunction
               with papers that directly compare TTE-TAVI with MAC and TEE-TAVI with GA. The rate of any PVL
               was not significantly different between TTE-TAVI with MAC and TEE-TAVI with GA. There was also
               no significant difference found for mild, moderate and severe PVL between the two groups. Importantly,
               there were no significant differences in safety outcomes such as 30-day mortality and complication rates.
               Resource utilization was lower with TTE use in conjunction with MAC; hospital LOS, contrast volume and
               procedure time were reduced. These results are important because the acute nature of post-TAVI PVL is
               poorly tolerated by patients; even mild PVL leads to higher early and late mortality [9,28]   .Existing post-TAVI
                                                       [9]
               PVL treatments have not been widely validated . For this reason, prophylactic measures to prevent PVL is
               paramount to safe TAVI procedures.

               Of the 16 papers included in this meta-analysis, only 2 directly compared TTE and TEE [7,27] . Our meta-
               analysis narrowed the gap in the literature by using a surrogate variable, which enabled us to use an
               additional 5 matched and 9 unmatched observational studies for a total of 3150 patients. Similar to
                                                                                       [7]
                                                                                                        [27]
               the previous 2 studies investigating echocardiography in TAVI, the Hayek et al.  and Sherifi et al.
               (propensity matched) papers did not find significant differences in PVL complications between TTE-TAVI
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259