Page 101 - Read Online
P. 101

Page 6 of 20                                                  Orekhov et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:10  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.04

               the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 complex to drive transcription of target genes from the regulatory IFN-
                                        [39]
               stimulated response elements .

               Experiments involving genetic deletion/inactivation of STAT-1 showed great significance of this
               transcriptional activator for induction of M1-mediated pro-inflammatory responses. STAT-1-deficient mice
               had limited capacity to remove pathogens and decreased resistance against Listeria monocytogenes, an
               infectious bacterium. In macrophages lacking STAT-1, Type I IFN- and IFN-γ-dependent responses were
               greatly reduced and impaired resulting in the loss of IFN-β production, Type I IFN-dependent signaling and
                                       [40]
               generation of M1 phenotype . STAT-2-deficient mice exhibited defects in antiviral immune response due to
                                                              [41]
               the absence of Type I IFN autocrine/paracrine signaling .
               However, the role of STAT-2 in IFN-γ signaling is probably dispensable since could be partially compensated
               by STAT-1 that is able to form transcriptionally active homodimers and drive expression of IFN-γ target
                                                                                 [41]
               genes including IRF-1 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I . In STAT2-deficient mice,
               IFN-α is able to induce MHC class II expression due to the dysfunctionality of the inhibitory feedback loop
               in response to Type I IFN. This feedback mechanism is mediated by SOCS1, which prevents Jak1-dependent
                                      [42]
               phosphorylation of STAT-2 .
               Role of IRF signaling in M1 differentiation
               IRF family contains 9 members that perform different signaling functions. Several of them, IRF-1 to IRF-
               5 and IRF-8 play key roles in macrophage polarization. Pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization largely
               depends on IRF-5, which can play a decisive role in choosing the pro- or anti-inflammatory polarization
                       [43]
               pathways . The expression of IRF-5 is stimulated by GM-CSF and can be induced by the activation of
                                                                      [44]
               TLR and other pattern-recognizing receptors during infection . Activation of the nucleotide-binding
               oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 receptor leads to the IRF-5 up-regulation due to receptor-
                                                                              [45]
               interacting serine-threonine kinase 2 (RIPK2)-mediated phosphorylation . IRF-5 transcriptional activity
                                                                              [46]
               can be also stimulated by inhibitor of NF-κB kinase subunit β (IKK-β)  and TANK-binding kinase 1
                     [45]
               (TBK1) .
               IRF-1 is another IRF involved in pro-inflammatory polarization of macrophages. Its expression is low in
                                                                                  [47]
               resting macrophages and can be up-regulated by IFN-γ upon M1 polarization . The activation of IRF-1
                                          [48]
                                                                            [49]
               is promoted by casein kinase II  and inhibited by IκB kinase-ε NF-κB . The effects of IRF-1 include up-
               regulation of pro-inflammatory genes, which can be mediated by cooperation with NF-κB and c-Jun, known
                                              [50]
               as “enhansosome” formation NF-κB . In murine macrophages, IRF-1 and IRF-2 were shown to regulate
                                           [51]
               LPS-induced expression of TLRs . At the same time, IRF-1 and IRF-2 can transcriptionally repress the
                                                                       [52]
               expression of anti-inflammatory (M2) genes, as was shown for IL-4 .
               IRF-8 is characterized by a weak interaction with chromatin in macrophage nucleus, which can, however, be
                                                                                         [53]
               strengthened following interaction with PU.1, IRF-1 or IRF-2, which reduces its mobility . Such interaction
                                                                                                       [54]
               can occur as a result of LPS stimulation, and results in up-regulation of a number of target genes .
               Among the pro-inflammatory genes induced by IRF-8 are IL-12p40, IL-12p35, IFN-β, and iNOS, that are
                                                         [55]
               characteristic for the M1 macrophage phenotype . The enhancement of IRF-8 function as transcription
               activator can occur via its ubiquitinilation in an E3 ubiquitin ligase tripartite-motif 21 (TRIM21)-dependent
                                                                                            [57]
                      [56]
               manner . By contrast, sumoylation of IRF-8 increases its activity as transcription repressor .
               IRF-2 recognizes the same regulatory elements in the promoters of target genes as IRF-1 and can act as
                                    [58]
               its competitive inhibitor . At the same time, IRF-2 can play a role of activator for IRF8, leading to the
                                                         [54]
               induction of neurofibromin 1 (NF1) transcription . Like IRF-8, IRF-2 is regulated by sumoylation, which
                                                         [59]
               enhances its transcriptional suppressor function . The role of IRF-2 in macrophage polarization is not
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106