Page 59 - Read Online
P. 59

Harky et al. Vessel Plus 2018;2:8                                           Vessel Plus
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1209.2018.12




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Ruptured isolated descending thoracic aortic
               aneurysm: open or endovascular repair?


               Amer Harky , Nichola Manu , Rafal Al Nasiri , Dilan Sanli , Ciaran Grafton-Clarke , Jeffrey Shi Kai Chan ,
                                                                                                        6
                                                                                     5
                                                                4
                                                     3
                                        1
                         1,2
               Chris Ho Ming Wong 6
               1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester CH2 1UL, UK.
               2 School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
               3 Department of General Surgery, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester CH2 1UL, UK
               4 Faculty of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67100, Turkey.
               5 School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE UK.
               6 Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Amer Harky, Department of Vascular Surgery, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester CH2 1UL, UK.
               E-mail: aaharky@gmail.com
               How to cite this article: Harky A, Manu N, Al Nasiri R, Sanli D, Grafton-Clarke C, Chan JSK, Wong CHM. Ruptured isolated
               descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: open or endovascular repair? Vessel Plus 2018;2:8.
               http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2018.12
               Received: 18 Mar 2018    First Decision: 9 Apr 2018    Revised: 27 Apr 2018    Accepted: 3 May 2018    Published: 7 May 2018

               Science Editor: Nikolaos Patelis, Mario F. L. Gaudino    Copy Editor: Jun-Yao Li    Production Editor: Huan-Liang Wu


               Abstract
               Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm management has gained momentum and became a topic of many debates at
               international levels since the evolution of endovascular repair. Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm is a
               clinical emergency which is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates if not managed properly. Prior to thoracic
               endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), open repair (OR) was the gold standard management, however since the evolution
               of TEVAR, this has changed. Several centers have reported many of their experiences and published that TEVAR can
               provide equal or even better perioperative outcomes when compared to OR, although the evidences can be of only short
               term and could be biased at different levels at the time of publication. This review article is aimed to examine current
               literature evidences behind the use of TEVAR vs. OR and the reported comparative clinical outcomes.


               Keywords: Open repair, aorta, endovascular repair, ruptured aorta, descending thoracic aorta



               INTRODUCTION
               Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) is a clinical entity that gained a lot of international attention
               in the current era. Currently, the presence of such aneurysms is mandated for elective repair to prevent

                           © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                       www.vpjournal.net
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64