Page 338 - Read Online
P. 338

Nikolay et al. Vessel Plus 2018;2:35                                        Vessel Plus
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1209.2018.45




               Original Article                                                              Open Access


               Revascularization method for patients with
               infrainguinal arterial disease


               Glushkov Nikolay, Ivanov Michael, Artemova Anastasia, Puzdriak Petr, Uryupina Anastasia, Bondarenko
               Pavel, Ivan Tigrov

               Department of General Surgery, North-West State Medical University, Saint Petersburg 195067, Russia.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Puzdriak Petr, Department of General Surgery, North-West State Medical University, Saint Petersburg
               195067, Russia. E-mail: hirurg495@yandex.ru
               How to cite this article: Nikolay G, Michael I, Anastasia A, Petr P, Anastasia U, Pavel B, Tigrov I. Revascularization method for
               patients with infrainguinal arterial disease. Vessel Plus 2018;2:35. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2018.45

               Received: 9 Jun 2018    First Decision: 28 Aug 2018    Revised: 13 Sep 2018    Accepted: 18 Sep 2018    Published: 29 Oct 2018
               Science Editors: Mario F. L. Gaudino, Igor A. Sobenin    Copy Editor: Cui Yu    Production Editor: Zhong-Yu Guo



               Abstract
               Aim: The aim of the study was to perform a comparative evaluation of the use of various methods of reconstructive
               assistance in the repair of the femoral-tibial segment in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

               Methods: Two hundred and fifty-three patients with atherosclerotic lesions of arteries below the inguinal ligament
               were examined and revascularized. According to the type of reconstruction performed, the patients were divided into 3
               groups: 98 patients underwent open operative interventions; 116 patients underwent endovascular interventions; 39 had
               hybrid reconstructions performed.

               Results: Minor blood loss, and stability of hemodynamics in the perioperative context positively characterize hybrid
               effects. The time spent in the resuscitation department and the shorter hospitalization of patients after hybrid
               revascularization methods were revealed in comparison with open methods. The absence of dangerous complications
               and the primary patency of the operated segment in the early postoperative period, approaching 100%, characterize
               hybrid techniques as an effective method of treating patients with infrainguinal arterial disease.


               Conclusion: Hybrid technologies are characterized by a shorter duration of surgical intervention, a low amount of blood
               loss and a lower incidence of complications in the early periods. The primary patency of the operated segment after
               hybrid techniques was higher than after open and endovascular surgical interventions.

               Keywords: Peripheral arterial disease, hybrid intervention, claudication





                           © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                       www.vpjournal.net
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343