Page 82 - Read Online
P. 82

Rademacher et al. Vessel Plus 2022;6:39  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.138  Page 7 of 9

               Table 3. Adjusted estimates: Reported adjusted estimates of association between POAF and stroke in the same eight meta-analyses
               presented in Table 1

                            Population     Included of   Total    Pooled estimate &   Time to follow up for creating
                Year & Name
                            (surgery)      studies      subjects  CI              estimate
                        [12]
                Megens et al.  ,   CABG, CABG + Valve 16  108,711  ES 1.25 (95%CI:   2.05 years
                2017                                              1.09-1.42)
                       [14]
                Kerwin et al.  ,   CABG    3            15,102    OR 1.88 (95%CI:   Not reported
                2020                                              1.02-3.46)

               blockers for the prevention of POAF suggested a reduced stroke incidence with these drugs. It remains
               unclear from these meta-analyses, and the respective RCT, whether this effect is attributable to a lower
               POAF burden or rather other effects of these drugs on the stroke risk. All pharmacological interventions
               used for the prevention of POAF have effects on the heart rate and blood pressure that could also reduce the
               stroke risk overall.


               An  upcoming  trial  by  the  Cardiothoracic  Surgery  Network  group  will  address  the  question  of
               anticoagulation in patients with POAF after cardiac surgery. This will be a randomized study comparing
               anticoagulation (warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants) with antiplatelet therapy, the Anticoagulation for
               New-Onset Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation After CABG (PACES) (NCT04045665). This trial should
               provide more definitive answers regarding the benefit or absence of anticoagulation in patients with POAF;
               it is less likely that it will contribute significant new information on whether POAF is the cause of
               cerebrovascular incidents or rather is an intermediate variable in the causal association of comorbidities and
               stroke. While awaiting new evidence, it may be reasonable to consider anticoagulation for patients with
               POAF at low risk for bleeding complications, and not use it in those with high risk of bleeding, weighing
               both conflicting evidence and current guidelines.


               CONCLUSION
               In summary, this systematic review did not find strong supporting evidence that POAF is causally related to
               stroke. However, substantial evidence exists for the said association, and several lines of evidence suggest
               that interventions known to lower cardiovascular risk overall may reduce long-term stroke risk, especially in
               high-risk individuals. An upcoming randomized clinical trial will hopefully provide a more definitive
               answer to whether anticoagulation in the setting of POAF provides benefits.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Writing of the manuscript: Rademacher N, Spellman C, Wyler von Ballmoos MC, Almassi GH
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Wyler von Ballmoos MC, Rademacher N, Spellman C
               Contributed to the conception of the study: Almassi GH


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87