Page 22 - Read Online
P. 22

Verriello et al. Vessel Plus 2021;5:51  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.69  Page 5 of 11

               Diagnostic pitfalls and red flags
               ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy is frequently diagnosed late, due to variable clinical presentations
               that make the disease difficult to recognize.


               Age at onset may vary, with a wide range from 20 to 80 years. Moreover, incomplete penetrance may be
               responsible for cases without a positive family history.

               Sporadic ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy is a diagnostic challenge. Some of the most frequent
               misdiagnosis are: CIDP, idiopathic polyneuropathy, AL amyloidosis, diabetic neuropathy motor neuron
               disease, and lumbar spinal stenosis [Table 2]. However, lumbar spinal stenosis, due to amyloid deposits
               within the ligamentum flavum, may be an early manifestation of systemic ATTRv amyloidosis .
                                                                                              [33]

               Some patients can have significant slowing of motor conduction velocity and sometimes fulfill EFNS/PNS
               criteria for a definite CIDP. Furthermore, increased protein levels in CSF and negative biopsy contribute to
               misdiagnosis [17-19] .


               The sensitivity of tissue biopsy may be different within the various mutations and the sural nerve biopsy
               may be unexpectedly negative as the deposition is often sporadic and random [34,35] .


               Within the CIDP scenario, fast disease progression and immunomodulatory treatment failure are signs that
               should suggest an alternative diagnosis, including ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.

               In the literature, patients with TTR-related amyloidosis who were diagnosed as affected by AL amyloidosis
               have been described [36,37] , due to the concomitant presence of monoclonal gammopathy or mistakes in
               immuno-labeling of amyloid aggregates.

               This erroneous diagnosis may lead to inappropriate chemotherapeutic treatments; thus, the correct
               identification of the amyloid precursor is mandatory.

               Family history and multi-organ involvement are clues that should raise the clinical suspicion of ATTRv
               amyloidosis with polyneuropathy.


               Considering all available literature and expert opinions, ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy should be
               suspected in case of a progressive sensory motor neuropathy associated with at least one of the following
               “red flags”: family history of neuropathy, early autonomic dysfunctions (e.g., erectile dysfunction or postural
               hypotension), weight loss not otherwise explained, bilateral CTS, cardiac signs and symptoms (e.g., heart
               hypertrophy, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, or ventricular blocks), renal impairment (e.g., albuminuria),
                                 [38]
               and vitreous opacities [Figure 1].
               Early diagnosis of ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy is important, considering currently available
               therapies. The main investigation is the genetic test, by mean of the TTR gene sequencing to search for
               amyloidogenic variants. Biopsy (e.g., salivary glands, sural nerve, or abdominal fat) allows detecting and
               typing of the amyloid in the tissue.

               Once the diagnosis has been made, assessing disease severity and monitoring its progression are crucial to
               establish the indication for treatment.
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27