Page 63 - Read Online
P. 63

Page 10 of 10                                                   Scotti et al. Vessel Plus 2021;5:6  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2020.68

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Feldman T., Wasserman HS., Herrmann HC., et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the edge-to-edge technique: six-month results
                   of the EVEREST Phase I Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2134–40.
               2.   Puls M., Lubos E., Boekstegers P., et al. One-year outcomes and predictors of mortality after MitraClip therapy in contemporary clinical
                   practice: Results from the German transcatheter mitral valve interventions registry. Eur Heart J 2016;37:703–12.
               3.   Maisano F., Franzen O., Baldus S., et al. Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world: early and 1-year results from the
                   ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the Mitraclip therapy in Europe. J Am Coll Cardiol
                   2013;62(12):1052–61.
               4.   Praz F., Spargias K., Chrissoheris M., et al. Compassionate use of the PASCAL transcatheter mitral valve repair system for patients with
                   severe mitral regurgitation: a multicentre, prospective, observational, first-in-man study. Lancet 2017;390:773–80.
               5.   Glower DD., Kar S., Trento A., et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in high-risk patients: Results of the
                   EVEREST II study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:172–81.
               6.   Lim DS., Reynolds MR., Feldman T., et al. Improved functional status and quality of life in prohibitive surgical risk patients with
                   degenerative mitral regurgitation after transcatheter mitral valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:182–92.
               7.   Deferm S., Bertrand PB., Verbrugge FH., et al. Atrial functional mitral regurgitation: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol
                   2019;73:2465–76.
               8.   Packer M., Grayburn PA. New evidence supporting a novel conceptual framework for distinguishing proportionate and disproportionate
                   functional mitral regurgitation. JAMA Cardiol 2020: 469-75.
               9.   Baumgartner H., Falk V., Bax JJ., et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J
                   2017;38:2739–86.
               10.  Stone GW., Lindenfeld JA., Abraham WT., et al. Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med
                   2018;379:2307–18.
               11.  Obadia JF., Messika-Zeitoun D., Leurent G., et al. Percutaneous repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation. N Engl J
                   Med 2018;379:2297–306.
               12.  Bonow RO., O’Gara PT., Adams DH., et al. 2020 focused update of the 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the
                   management of mitral regurgitation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll
                   Cardiol 2020;75:2236–70.
               13.  Scotti A., Margonato A., Godino C. Percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation and advanced heart
                   failure. Mini-Invasive Surg 2020;4:49.
               14.  Godino C., Munafò A., Scotti A., et al. MitraClip in secondary mitral regurgitation as a bridge to heart transplantation: 1-year outcomes
                   from the International MitraBridge Registry. J Hear Lung Transplant 2020;39:1353–62.
               15.  Feldman T., Cilingiroglu M. Percutaneous leaflet repair and annuloplasty for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011:529–37.
               16.  Lubos E., Schlüter M., Vettorazzi E., et al. MitraClip therapy in surgical high-risk patients: Identification of echocardiographic variables
                   affecting acute procedural outcome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:394–402.
               17.  Brown JM., O’Brien SM., Wu C., Sikora JAH., Griffith BP., Gammie JS. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising
                   108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J
                   Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:82–90.
               18.  Mylotte D., Andalib A., Thériault-Lauzier P., et al. Transcatheter heart valve failure: a systematic review. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1306–27.
               19.  Del Val D., Ferreira-Neto AN., Wintzer-Wehekind J., et al. Early experience with transcatheter mitral valve replacement: a systematic
                   review. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e013332.
               20.  Taramasso M., Gavazzoni M., Nickenig G., Maisano F. Transcatheter mitral repair and replacement: which procedure for which patient?
                   EuroIntervention 2019;15:867–74.
               21.  Adamo M., Godino C., Giannini C., et al. Left ventricular reverse remodelling predicts long-term outcomes in patients with functional
                   mitral regurgitation undergoing MitraClip therapy: results from a multicentre registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;21:ejhf.1343.
               22.  Godino C., Salerno A., Cera M., et al. Impact and evolution of right ventricular dysfunction after successful MitraClip implantation in
                   patients with functional mitral regurgitation. IJC Hear Vasc 2016;11:90–8.
               23.  Bapat V., Rajagopal V., Meduri C., et al. Early experience with new transcatheter mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol
                   2018;71:12–21.
               24.  Sorajja P., Moat N., Badhwar V., et al. Initial feasibility study of a new transcatheter mitral prosthesis: the first 100 patients. J Am Coll
                   Cardiol 2019;73(11):1250–60.
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68