Page 37 - Read Online

Andò et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:15 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.26 Page 19 of 22

27. Zhang M, Matsumura M, Usui E, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived calcium score to predict stent expansion in severely calcified
lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:e010296. DOI
28. Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, et al. Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical
coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for intravascular optical coherence tomography
standardization and validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1058-72. DOI
29. Fujino A, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, et al. A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent
underexpansion. EuroIntervention 2018;13:e2182-9. DOI
30. Kobayashi Y, Okura H, Kume T, et al. Impact of target lesion coronary calcification on stent expansion. Circ J 2014;78:2209-14.
DOI
31. Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL, et al. Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation
2002;106:1640-5. DOI
32. Krishnamoorthy P, Vengrenyuk Y, Ueda H, et al. Three-dimensional volumetric assessment of coronary artery calcification in
patients with stable coronary artery disease by OCT. EuroIntervention 2017;13:312-9. DOI
33. Sharma SK, Vengrenyuk Y, Kini AS. IVUS, OCT, and coronary artery calcification: is there a bone of contention? JACC Cardiovasc
Imaging 2017;10:880-2. DOI
34. Kume T, Okura H, Kawamoto T, et al. Assessment of the coronary calcification by optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention
2011;6:768-72. PubMed
35. Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary
interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions.
EuroIntervention 2018;14:656-77. DOI
36. Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP. Management of calcific coronary artery lesions: is it time to change our interventional therapeutic
approach? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:1465-78. DOI PubMed
37. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography
to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388:2618-28. DOI
38. Bergmark B, Dallan LAP, Pereira GTR, et al. Decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention guided by optical
coherence tomography: insights from the LightLab initiative. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2022;15:872-81. DOI
39. Andò G, Cortese B, Frigoli E, et al. Acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale of the AKI-MATRIX
(acute kidney injury-minimizing adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX)
sub-study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:950-7. DOI
40. Andò G, Costa F, Trio O, Oreto G, Valgimigli M. Impact of vascular access on acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary
intervention. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2016;17:333-8. DOI PubMed
41. Okamoto N, Ueda H, Bhatheja S, et al. Procedural and one-year outcomes of patients treated with orbital and rotational atherectomy
with mechanistic insights from optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention 2019;14:1760-7. DOI
42. Sotomi Y, Cavalcante R, Shlofmitz RA, et al. Quantification by optical coherence tomography imaging of the ablation volume
obtained with the Orbital Atherectomy System in calcified coronary lesions. EuroIntervention 2016;12:1126-34. PubMed
43. Kini AS, Vengrenyuk Y, Pena J, et al. Optical coherence tomography assessment of the mechanistic effects of rotational and orbital
atherectomy in severely calcified coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86:1024-32. DOI
44. Fitzgerald PJ, Ports TA, Yock PG. Contribution of localized calcium deposits to dissection after angioplasty. An observational study
using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1992;86:64-70. DOI PubMed
45. Mauri L, Bonan R, Weiner BH, et al. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the prevention of restenosis: results of the Cutting Balloon
Global Randomized Trial. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1079-83. DOI
46. Karvouni E, Stankovic G, Albiero R, et al. Cutting balloon angioplasty for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Catheter
Cardiovasc Interv 2001;54:473-81. DOI
47. Okura H, Hayase M, Shimodozono S, et al. Mechanisms of acute lumen gain following cutting balloon angioplasty in calcified and
noncalcified lesions: an intravascular ultrasound study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:429-36. DOI
48. Fonseca A, de Ribamar Costa Jr J, Abizaid A, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the novel AngioSculpt scoring balloon
catheter for the treatment of complex coronary lesions. J Invasive Cardiol 2008;20:21-7. PubMed
49. Secco GG, Ghione M, Mattesini A, et al. Very high-pressure dilatation for undilatable coronary lesions: indications and results with a
new dedicated balloon. EuroIntervention 2016;12:359-65. DOI
50. Secco GG, Buettner A, Parisi R, et al. Clinical experience with very high-pressure dilatation for resistant coronary lesions.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2019;20:1083-7. DOI
51. Fourrier JL, Bertrand ME, Auth DC, Lablanche JM, Gommeaux A, Brunetaud JM. Percutaneous coronary rotational angioplasty in
humans: preliminary report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:1278-82. DOI PubMed
52. Prati F, Di Mario C, Moussa I, et al. In-stent neointimal proliferation correlates with the amount of residual plaque burden outside the
stent: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1999;99:1011-4. DOI
53. MacIsaac AI, Bass TA, Buchbinder M, et al. High speed rotational atherectomy: outcome in calcified and noncalcified coronary
artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:731-6. DOI
54. Bittl JA, Chew DP, Topol EJ, Kong DF, Califf RM. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty versus atherectomy, cutting balloon atherotomy, or laser angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:936-42. DOI PubMed