Page 85 - Read Online

Squizzato et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:16 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.05 Page 13 of 14

experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2022;86:399-407. DOI PubMed
4. Geisbüsch P, Hoffmann S, Kotelis D, Able T, Hyhlik-Dürr A, Böckler D. Reinterventions during midterm follow-up after
endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic disease. J Vasc Surg 2011;53:1528-33. DOI PubMed
5. Ishimaru S. Endografting of the aortic arch. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11:II-62-71. DOI
6. Brown JA, Arnaoutakis GJ, Szeto WY, Serna-Gallegos D, Sultan I. Endovascular repair of the aortic arch: state of the art. J Card Surg
2021;36:4292-300. DOI
7. Altnji HE, Bou-Saïd B, Walter-Le Berre H. Morphological and stent design risk factors to prevent migration phenomena for a thoracic
aneurysm: a numerical analysis. Med Eng Phys 2015;37:23-33. DOI PubMed
8. Dieleman IM, Zuidema R, de Beaufort HW, et al. Determination of the gained proximal sealing zone length after debranching of the
left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Cardiovasc Surg 2023;64:134-41. DOI PubMed
9. Kudo T, Kuratani T, Shimamura K, Sawa Y. Determining the optimal proximal landing zone for TEVAR in the aortic arch: comparing
the occurrence of the bird-beak phenomenon in zone 0 vs zones 1 and 2. J Endovasc Ther 2020;27:368-76. DOI
10. Lescan M. Apposition and accuracy of TEVAR-is proximal angulation the key? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021;60:1464-5. DOI
PubMed
11. Lescan M, Czerny M, Berezowski M, et al. Morphologic performance analysis of the Relay nonbare stent graft in dissected thoracic
aorta. J Vasc Surg 2019;70:1390-8. DOI
12. Antonello M, Squizzato F, Dall’Antonia A, Grego F, Piazza M. GORE TAG thoracic endograft with active control system: landing
accuracy and wall apposition in an initial clinical experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;58:261-9. DOI
13. Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, et al. Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving
the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European
Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:133-62. DOI
14. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, de Beaufort HW, Secchi F, et al. A geometric reappraisal of proximal landing zones for thoracic
endovascular aortic repair according to aortic arch types. J Vasc Surg 2017;65:1584-90. DOI
15. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, de Beaufort HW, Piffaretti G, et al. The modified arch landing areas nomenclature predicts proximal
endograft failure after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;58:309-18. DOI
16. Nasr B, Savean J, Albert B, et al. Thoracic stent-graft migration: the role of the geometric modifications of the stent-graft at 3 years.
Ann Vasc Surg 2019;58:16-23. DOI
17. Boufi M, Guivier-Curien C, Dona B, et al. Risk factor analysis for the mal-positioning of thoracic aortic stent grafts. Eur J Vasc
Endovasc Surg 2016;52:56-63. DOI
18. Kudo T, Kuratani T, Shimamura K, et al. Type 1a endoleak following Zone 1 and Zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair: effect of
bird-beak configuration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:718-24. DOI
19. Cao L, Ge Y, He Y, et al. Association between aortic arch angulation and bird-beak configuration after thoracic aortic stent graft repair
of type B aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020;31:688-96. DOI
20. Figueroa CA, Taylor CA, Chiou AJ, Yeh V, Zarins CK. Magnitude and direction of pulsatile displacement forces acting on thoracic
aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther 2009;16:350-8. DOI PubMed PMC
21. Domanin M, Bissacco D, Romarowsky RM, et al. Drag forces after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. general review of the literature.
Ann Vasc Surg 2021;75:479-88. DOI
22. Melissano G, Civilini E, Bertoglio L, et al. Results of endografting of the aortic arch in different landing zones. Eur J Vasc Endovasc
Surg 2007;33:561-6. DOI
23. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, van Bakel TM, Romarowski RM, et al. The modified arch landing areas nomenclature (MALAN) improves
prediction of stent graft displacement forces: proof of concept by computational fluid dynamics modelling. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
2018;55:584-92. DOI
24. Lee WA. Failure modes of thoracic endografts: prevention and management. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:792-9. DOI PubMed
25. Antonello M, Squizzato F, Colacchio EC, Spertino A, Grego F, Piazza M. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair using the C-TAG®
device with ACTIVE CONTROL system. Surg Technol Int 2022;40:sti40/1509. DOI PubMed
26. Chen Y, Zhang S, Liu L, Lu Q, Zhang T, Jing Z. Retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e004649. DOI PubMed PMC
27. Riambau V, Giudice R, Trabattoni P, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the low-profile relay stent-graft in patients with thoracic
aortic disease: the regeneration study. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;58:180-9. DOI
28. Piazza M, Squizzato F, Milan L, Miccoli T, Grego F, Antonello M. Incidence and predictors of early neurological complications
following thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair in the global registry for endovascular aortic treatment (great). Eur J Vasc Endovasc
Surg 2019;58:e238. DOI
29. Boufi M, Aouini F, Guivier-Curien C, et al. Examination of factors in type I endoleak development after thoracic endovascular repair.
J Vasc Surg 2015;61:317-23. DOI
30. Kuo EC, Veranyan N, Johnson CE, et al. Impact of proximal seal zone length and intramural hematoma on clinical outcomes and
aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg 2019;69:987-95. DOI
31. Yoon WJ, Mell MW. Outcome comparison of thoracic endovascular aortic repair performed outside versus inside proximal landing
zone length recommendation. J Vasc Surg 2020;72:1883-90. DOI PubMed
32. Lombardi JV, Famularo M, Kratzberg J, Roeder BA. Effect of proximal fixation length on complications after endovascular repair of