Page 247 - Read Online
P. 247

Page 12 of 14                 Sufali et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:16  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.139

               either in open fashion or endovascularly between 2000 and 2013 in 12 Japanese centers, 631 patients
               received intraoperative MEPs monitoring and the outcome was compared with the outcome of 583 patients
               treated without neuromonitoring. MEPs failed to improve the outcome. The low number of cases
               performed under SSEPs/MEPs until 2022 in our department precludes a meaningful consideration of its
               role in the secondary prevention of SCI.

               This study has limitations primarily concerning its retrospective nature, which includes potential biases
               related to data collection and incomplete medical records, and the small size of SCI group that may not fully
               represent the broader SCI population, potentially limiting general conclusions. Further research with larger
               and more diverse SCI groups is necessary to validate and extend these findings.


               In conclusion, dedicated multidisciplinary SCI prevention protocol in elective F/B-EVAR for Crawford’s I-
               III TAAAs is feasible and safe, with encouraging rates of SCI (8% overall SCI, 6% permanent impairment
               with 3% paraplegia). The 30-day mortality (3%), cardiopulmonary morbidities (6%), and dialysis rate (3%)
               were satisfactory, as well as the estimated survival at 3 years (62%). Patients with SCI had a significantly
               lower survival (18% vs. 69%) at 2 years.

               Further high-quality scientific data are needed to define the role of prophylactic or therapeutic CSFD.
               Although defining the efficacy of individual SCI prevention measures is not easy, treatment staging has been
               widely associated with lower rate of SCI.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conception and design: Sufali G, Faggioli G
               Analysis and interpretation: Sufali G, Gallitto E, Pini R, Vacirca A
               Data collection: Sufali G, Mascoli C
               Writing the article: Sufali G
               Critical revision of the article: Faggioli G, Vacirca A, Gargiulo M
               Final approval of the article: Sufali G, Faggioli G, Gallitto E, Pini R, Vacirca A, Mascoli C, Gargiulo M
               Statistical analysis: Sufali G, Pini R
               Overall responsibility: Gargiulo M


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Gargiulo M, Faggioli G and Gallitto E are consultants for Cook Medical. The remaining authors declared
               that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               All patients signed a dedicated consent for both the complex endovascular procedure and the analysis of
               their anonymous data. For the present study, data of all patients were extrapolated in a second electronic
               database and retrospectively analyzed. The study was performed with the approval of the ethical review
               board of IRCCS - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (T.Ev.AAA-155/2015/U/Oss).
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252