Page 720 - Read Online
P. 720

Page 8 of 12                                    Meltzer et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:61  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.122

                                                Table 1. Demographic data (n = 91)
                              Characteristic                             Mean (SD) or No (%)
                              Age                                            39.8 (12.6)
                              BMI                                            25.9 (4.3)
                              Duration testosterone (months)                 87.8 (79.8)
                              Previous hysterectomy and oopherectomy         46 (50.5)
                              Hysterectomy/oopherectomy at time of metoidioplasty  45 (49.5)


                                     Table 2. Secondary procedures following metoidioplasty (n = 91)
                              Procedure                                   Mean (SD) or No (%)
                              Scrotoplasty*                                   75 (82.4)
                              TE + TI                                         75 (82.4)
                              TI                                              68 (74.7)
                              Monsplasty                                      54 (59.3)
                                                       BMI 18-25              24
                                                       BMI 25-30              19
                                                       BMI 30-35              9
                                                       BMI 35 <               2
                              *Have had or are scheduled to have scrotoplasty. TE: tissue expanders; TI: testicular implants


                                              Table 3. Urologic complications (n = 91)
                              Description                                     No (%)
                              Fistula                                          1 (1)
                                                   Surgical revision           0
                                                   Spontaneously closed        1 (1)
                              Stricture                                        5 (5.5)
                                                   Stricture repair            2 (2.2)
                                                   Dilation and urethrotomy    3 (3.3)


               patients, 75 (82.4%) patients underwent at least one secondary procedure [Table 2]. The most common
               secondary procedure was placement of scrotal tissue expanders followed by scrotal implants (82.4%). A
               monsplasty was performed in 54 (59.3%) patients and was indicated in a wide range of BMIs. Mean follow-
               up for all patients was 15.4 months.

               The urologic complications are listed in Table 3. The most common complication was a stricture in five
               patients (5.5%). Two of these strictures were treated with buccal mucosa graft at the stricture site after one
               internal urethrotomy and dilation failed. One of those patients had a stricture recurrence, and ultimately
               underwent a perineal urethrostomy and secondary closure without buccal mucosa. The three other patients
               were treated with intermittent self-dilation following a single urethrotomy.

               There were 80 (87.9%) patients who reported being able stand and urinate with a strong stream [Table 4].
               Two patients reported a strong stream, even if they were unable to urinate while standing.

               While sexual function outcomes were not studied in depth, no patients reported a change in ability to
               orgasm by clitoral stimulation following the procedure.


               DISCUSSION
               Metoidioplasty is a reliable procedure for creating a small phallus that allows patients to stand and
                     [8]
               urinate . There exist several variations of this procedure around the world and relatively few practitioners.
                                                                            [6]
               Our approach is a novel modification of the Takamatsu technique . We propose that the primary
   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725