Page 713 - Read Online
P. 713

Meltzer et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:61                                   Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2020.122                                  Aesthetic Research




               Original Article                                                              Open Access


               Metoidioplasty using labial advancement flaps for
               urethroplasty



               Toby R. Meltzer, Nick O. Esmonde

               The Meltzer Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85253, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Toby R. Meltzer, The Meltzer Clinic, 7025 N Scottsdale Rd. Ste 302, Scottsdale, AZ 85253, USA.
               E-mail: tmeltzer@tmeltzer.com

               How to cite this article: Meltzer TR, Esmonde NO. Metoidioplasty using labial advancement flaps for urethroplasty. Plast Aesthet
               Res 2020;7:61. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.122

               Received: 22 May 2020    First Decision: 12 Aug 2020    Revised: 2 Sep 2020    Accepted: 10 Oct 2020    Published: 6 Nov 2020

               Academic Editor: Marlon E. Buncamper    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu


               Abstract
               Aim: A variation of the ring metoidioplasty has been performed for masculinizing transgender surgery by the
               senior surgeon since 2010. It does not require buccal grafts or vaginal wall flaps. An excisional vaginectomy was
               completed in all patients. We sought to evaluate the urologic outcomes and complications for this technique.
               Further, we provide a detailed technical description of the technique, including ancillary masculinizing procedures.


               Methods: This is a retrospective, single surgeon chart review of all patients undergoing metoidioplasty from
               2010 to 2020. Demographics, outcomes, and complications are reported. A self-reported patient questionnaire
               provided data on patient-perceived urologic outcomes.

               Results: Ninety-one patients were included in the study, with 80 (87.9%) patients reporting ability to stand and
               void with a strong stream. We observed five strictures (5.5%) and one fistula (1%). Scrotoplasty with tissue
               expanders and testicular implants were performed in 75 (82.4%) patients, while monsplasty was performed in 54
               (59%) patients.


               Conclusion: Our technique has a low complication rate and patients report a strong urinary stream and the
               ability to stand in the large majority of cases. Ancillary masculinizing procedures are common. The limitations
               of metoidioplasty, in general, still persist, which are the small phallus size and variable ability to clear the zipper
               without lowering the pants to void.

               Keywords: Metoidioplasty, urethroplasty, transgender surgery, transmasculine surgery


                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                     www.parjournal.net
   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718