Page 302 - Read Online
P. 302

Page 6 of 10                                            Evans et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:28  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.53

               in solution that slowly release their oxygen gas into the solution in which they are formed, providing a
               revolutionary new modality for tissue oxygenation. Strong data have demonstrated improved wound
               oxygenation, transplant survival and preservation times. This may have major implications for plastic
               surgery: oxygenation of lipoaspirate and improved fat graft survival [117] .

               CONCLUSION
               Fat and stem cell technology offer tremendous clinical applications in plastic surgery. We still need to
               continue to work on the science of this technology. Only by understanding the molecular and tissue
               interactions will we be able to modify and utilize this technology to its full advantage.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Dr Evans and Widgerow contribution was equal

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroglast cultures by defined factors. Cell
                   2006;126:633-76.
               2.   Lowry WE, Richter L, Yachechko R, Pyle AD, Tchieu J, et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal
                   fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:2883-8.
               3.   Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Schorderet P, Carey BW, Beard C, et al. Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes
                   to pluripotency. Cell 2008;133:250-64.
               4.   Aasen T, Raya A, Barrero MJ, Garreta E, Consiglio A, et al. Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human
                   keratinoctyes. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:1276-84.
               5.   Takenaka C, Nishishita N, Takada N, Jakt LM, Kawamata S. Effective generation of iPS cells from CD 34+ cord blodd cells by inhibition
                   of p53. Exp Hematol 2010; 38:154-62.
               6.   Phanthong P, Raveh-Amit H, Li T, Kitiyanant Y, Dinnyes A. Is aging a barrier to reprogramming? Lessons from induced pluripotent stem
                   cells. Biogerontology 2013;14:591-602.
               7.   Gonzalez F, Barragan Monasterio M, Tiscornia G, Montserrat Pulido N, et al. Generation of mouse-induced pluripotent stem cells by
                   transient expression of a single nonviral polycistronic vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:8918-22.
               8.   Okita K, Nakagawa M, Hyenjong H, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors.
                   Science 2008;322:949-53.
               9.   Steinemann D, Gohring G, Schlegelberger B. Genetic instability of modified stem cells - a first step towards malignant transformation.
                   Am J Stem Cells 2013;2:39-51.
               10.  Mayshar Y, Ben-David U, Lavon N, Biancotti JC, Yakir B, et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human
   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307