Page 127 - Read Online
P. 127

Stoneburner et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:13                               Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2019.028                                  Aesthetic Research




               Systematic Review                                                             Open Access


               Review of soft tissue coverage options in distraction
               osteogenesis of the extremity


               Jacqueline Stoneburner , Beina Azadgoli , Anna C. Howell , Douglass Tucker , Geoffrey Marecek ,
                                                                                 2
                                                                 1
                                                                                                  2
                                    1
                                                  1
               Joseph Carey 1
               1 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
               2 Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Joseph Carey, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Department of Surgery, Keck School of
               Medicine of USC, 1510 San Pablo St, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. E-mail: joseph.carey@med.usc.edu
               How to cite this article: Stoneburner J, Azadgoli B, Howell AC, Tucker D, Marecek G, Carey J. Review of soft tissue coverage options in
               distraction osteogenesis of the extremity. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:13. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.028
               Received: 13 Sep 2019    First Decision: 15 Jan 2020    Revised: 12 Feb 2020    Accepted: 3 Mar 2020     Published: 20 Mar 2020

               Science Editor: Matthew L. Iorio    Copy Editor: Jing-Wen Zhang    Production Editor: Tian Zhang



               Abstract

               Aim: To review the choices of soft tissue coverage in distraction osteogenesis of the extremity.

               Methods: A PubMed literature search yielded 14 articles included for systematic review. Data were extracted from each
               article if available (sample size, patient age, surgical indications, type of flap, use of additional modalities, method of
               bone osteogenesis, postoperative events, follow-up, satisfaction, weight-bearing status, and success rate). Unpaired
               t -tests were performed to compare complication rates. A retrospective review of three cases was also conducted.

               Results: Fourteen articles discussed 145 patients with a mean age of 33.4 years and 146 extremity injuries followed
               over 3.3 years on average. Indications included chronic osteomyelitis or nonunion (58.2%) and acute trauma (41.8%).
               Average time from injury was 1.1 years. Ilizarov frame was used in 12 articles. Free flaps (88.0%) or rotational flaps
               (12.0%) were used, with muscle flaps (96.7%) being most common. Most extremities received free latissimus dorsi or
               rectus abdominis flaps. Bone grafts and antibiotic beads were often used in conjunction. Although complications and
               reoperations were not uncommon (up to 30%), 98.8% of patients on average were ultimately weight bearing and all
               articles reported > 91% success rate. Additionally, the rates of any complication were not statistically different between
               “fix and flap” protocol and flap or frame first. Lastly, a three-patient case series is presented.

               Conclusion: Bone transport with soft tissue reconstruction remains an excellent choice for patients with large bony
               defects or who are unable to undergo autologous bone grafting. Not one surgical approach to limb salvage is superior,
               and decision should be made on a case by case basis between the surgeon and the patient.

                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                    www.parjournal.net
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132