Page 306 - Read Online
P. 306

Page 4 of 7                                              Gupta et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2018;5:41  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2018.51

               Table 1. Results
                                                 Days taken
                                                                                          2
                                                                                                 Wound
               Serial         TBSA   % area with   for complete   Area of unhealed wound in target area (cm )  culture came
                     Age  Sex  burn   second degree
               No.            (%)  superficial burn  healing of   Day 0  Day 3  Day 6  Day 10 Day 13 Day 17  positive during
                                                 target area                                    treatment
               1     26  F    20%       10%          10    1550  1470  500    0     0     0        No
               2     35  M    15%       5%           10    900   840   81     0     0     0        No
               3     28  M    20%       5%           6     730   630   0      0     0     0        No
               4     40  F    16%       10%          13    1740  1650  780    320   0     0        No
               5     29  M    20%       15%          10    2500  2480  480    0     0     0        Yes
               6     25  F    40%       20%          17    3140  3020  1970   940   230   0        No
               7     42  M    35%       15%          10    2430  2200  390    0     0     0        No
               8     23  F    30%       20%          10    3280  3130  900    0     0     0        No
               9     33  M    30%       15%          13    2250  2170  1300   460   0     0        Yes
               10    42  M    15%       10%          13    1600  1600  680    120   0     0        No
               11    28  F    35%       20%          13    3070  2900  1910   820   0     0        No
               12    26  F    20%       10%          10    1790  1680  580    0     0     0        Yes
               13    30  M    40%       25%          17    3970  3870  2340   1090  160   0        Yes
               14    35  F    25%       15%          10    2100  2100  690    0     0     0        No
               15    26  M    36%       10%          10    1560  1500  380    0     0     0        No
               16    19  F    20%       15%          10    2380  2190  690    0     0     0        No
               17    28  F    30%       15%          13    2430  2300  1400   480   0     0        No
               18    40  F    20%       10%          13    1480  1400  740    185   0     0        Yes
               19    24  F    18%       10%          10    1740  1650  560    0     0     0        No
               20    32  F    25%       15%          17    2290  2200  1740   890   356   0        No

               TBSA: total body surface area

               [Figure 2]. Findings were recorded and assessment done when wound healed completely [Figures 3 and 4].
               Clinical history and examination were done at the time of each dressing to look for any adverse effect related
               to laser therapy. Any pigment changes, itching, erythema or burning of normal skin were considered as
               adverse effects related to laser therapy.


               RESULTS
               A total of twenty patients are included in the study with the mean age 30.55 years (19-42 years). Eight male
               and twelve female patients are included. The average time taken for complete healing of areas with second
               degree superficial burns was 11.75 (SD 2.86) days. Observations are presented in Table 1. Mean area treated
               was 2146 (SD 804) cm  which corresponds to 13.5 (SD 5.2) BSA% second degree superficial burns. The patient
                                 2
               with the smallest target area was healed on day 6; ten patients were healed on day 10, six patients on day 13,
               and three on day 17. Mean sessions of LLLT given for one patient were 3.55 (SD 0.83).


               DISCUSSION
                          [7]
               Posten et al.  introduced LLLT to improve wound healing. Standard parameters for LLLT are not defined
               and various studies used different parameters. The range of parameters used is power output 1-100 mW and
               wavelength 300-10,600 nm (red and infrared light). It can be continuous or pulsed. It is given in dose of 0.01-
                                                                     [7]
                       2
               100 J/cm . The duration of therapy varies between 10 to 3000 s . The commonly used lasers for LLLT are
               helium-neon (HeNe), GaAs, indium gallium aluminum phosphorous (InGaAlP), and gallium aluminum
                               [7]
               arsenide (GaAlAs) .
               The cytochromes in the mitochondria absorb the laser radiation and convert it into ATP’s which is used for
                                                                                                        [8]
               stimulation of cell proliferation and synthesis of proteins resulting in photobiological activation of the cell .
               Target cells of LLL are myofibroblasts. In animal studies LLLT has been shown to increase myofibroblast
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311