Page 43 - Read Online
P. 43

in the mid‑1980’s and continues to be used due of its   limitations  of  the  techniques.  Patients  with  unrealistic
          versatility.                                        expectations that do not understand this  information
                                                              must be discouraged from the procedure because the level
          Traction treatments are the only ones able to achieve   of disappointment will likely be very high. It is extremely
          effective length improvements  of the penis, producing   important not to assure the patient that any type of result
          an increase in actual  tissue mass and at the same time   will be an improvement; patients should understand that
          “softening” the corpora  cavernosa fascial and osseous   it is possible  to see  no improvement,  an event caused
          attachments.  The combined use of both types of     usually by an inadequate scar contraction.
          treatments  (suspensory ligament release and extender
          use) can produce the best outcome by extending the   Composite augmentation phalloplasty techniques are safe
          “hidden”  part of  the  penis  with  generation  of additional   and reproducible and yield satisfactory results if properly
          tissue.  All penis  lengthening  techniques  are  based   performed. Although apparently easy to perform, a
          on the release of natural physiologic anchors that   thorough  knowledge of anatomy  and grafting  techniques
          bind the corpora cavernosa to the pubic symphysis,   is needed to get good results and avoid complications.
          isquiopubic bone branches, and abdominal aponeurotic   Volumetric  enhancement  by  ligament  release  and
          expansions.  Although this  lengthening  can be  performed   cutaneous advancement together with an increase in
          through a simple transverse incision or even using an   girth with fat grafting is probably a safer option, with
          endoscope  (not published), a number  of ancillary skin   better results and lower morbidity. The future of penis
          advancements can be performed to ease ligament release   enlargement will be enhanced with techniques that
          and to procure advancement and stabilization,  and thus   provide dynamic improvements in size, possibly through
          prevent length loss due to scar contracture. In this   the use of tissue engineering.
          regard several techniques  have  been  published such as
          M‑plasty  (popularized  in  China  and reported by  Reed ),   REFERENCES
                                                        [15]
          VY advancement (Roos and Lissoos ), Z‑plasty (Horton ),
                                                        [17]
                                       [16]
          double Z‑plasty  (Alter [18,19] ) and personal techniques  of   1.   Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Gontero P, Muir GH, Natali A, Caldarera E, Di
                  [20]
          Abecassis  and Panfilov.  Although the author supports   Loro F, Biscioni S, Rizzo M. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile
                               [21]
          the use of local  tissues to fill the advancement gap to   2.   lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res 2002;14:283‑6.
                                                                  Monreal J. Fat tissue as a permanent implant: new instruments and refinements.
          additionally maintain  advancement,  some authors have   Aesthet Surg J 2003;23:213‑6.
          published their experience inserting  small testicular   3.   Monreal J. Male and female genital aesthetic surgery: basic techniques and
          prostheses as spacers with no better results. [22]      concepts. AECEPJ 2006;1:8‑17.
                                                              4.   Hinderer  UT,  Espinosa  JF.  New  enlargement  technique  with  volume
          In  our  practice  performing  suspensory  ligament  release,   enhancement in penis hypoplasia and hypospadias.  Cir Plast Iberlatinamer
          skin  flap advancement  together  with  simultaneous  girth   1997;23:151‑60.
          enlargement  using fat grafts is the most satisfactory   5.   Dillon BE, Chama NB, Honig SC. Penile size and penile enlargement surgery:
                                                                  a review. Int J Impot Res 2008;20:519‑29.
          approach to increase penis size. This composite technique   6.   Ghanem H, Glina S, Assalian P, Buvat J. Position paper: management of men
          generates real volume increase which results in a better   complaining of a small penis despite an actually normal size.  J Sex Med
          perceptual  outcome for the patient. Additionally, the   2013;10:294‑303.
          increase in shaft convexity and downward position creates   7.   Parodi PC, Dominici M, Moro U. Penis invalidating cicatricial outcomes in
                                                                  an enlargement phalloplasty case with polyacrylamide gel (Formacryl). Int J
          the  illusion  of  a  longer  penis  as  well.  The  incidence  of   Impot Res 2006;18:318‑21.
          complications or side effects is relatively low and easy to   8.   Oderda M, Gontero P. Non‑invasive methods of penile lengthening: fact or
          solve without affecting final results. A thorough knowledge   fiction? BJU Int 2011;107:1278‑82.
          of regional anatomy helps to prevent serious or minor   9.   Colpi GM, Martini P, Scroppo FI, Macini M, Castiglioni F. Efficacy of daily
          complications. There are two good safety rules: perform   penis‑stretching technique to elongate the “small penis”. Int J Impot Res
                                                                  2002;14:155.
          the ligament release as close to the bone as possible and   10.  Shaeer  O,  Shaeer  K.  Penile  girth  augmentation  using  flaps “Shaeer’s
          do not perform any grafting that may exceed the capacity   augmentation phalloplasty”: a case report. J Sex Med 2006;3:164‑9.
          of the tissue. Although liponecrotic cyst occurrence can   11.  Alei G, Letizia P, Ricottilli F, Simone P, Alei L, Massoni F, Ricci S. Original
          be solved easily, damage to the deep penile neurovascular   technique for penile girth augmentation through porcine dermal acellular
                                                                  grafts: results in a 69‑patient series. J Sex Med 2012;9:1945‑53.
          structures  usually  has  disastrous  consequences.  Patient   12.  Jin Z, Wu YG, Yuan YM, Peng J, Gong YQ, Li GY, Song WD, Cui WS, He XY, Xin ZC.
          satisfaction after augmentation phalloplasty  is lower   Tissue engineering penoplasty with biodegradable scaffold Maxpol‑T cografted
          when compared with other popular  aesthetic surgical    autologous fibroblasts for small penis syndrome. J Androl 2011;32:491‑5.
          procedures. In our series,  only 32%  perceived the result   13.  Perovic  SV,  Byun  JS,  Scheplev  P,  Djordjevic  ML,  Kim  JH,  Bubanj T.  New
                                                                  perspectives  of  penile  enhancement  surgery:  tissue  engineering  with
          as very good and an additional 43%  as good, in spite   biodegradable scaffolds. Eur Urol 2006;49:139‑47.
          of being clearly informed about the limitations and   14.  Austoni E, Guarneri A, Cazzaniga A. A new technique for augmentation
          outcomes for other patients and follow‑up demonstration   phalloplasty: albugineal surgery with bilateral saphenous grafts ‑three years
                                                                  of experience. Eur Urol 2002;42:245‑53.
          of improved average measurements.  As with any other   15.  Reed HM. Augmentation phalloplasty with girth enhancement employing
          aesthetic surgery procedure, informing  the patient is   autologous  fat  transplantation:  a  preliminary  report. Am  J  Cosmet  Surg
          extremely important in achieving an adequate degree of   1994;11:85‑9.
          satisfaction. Two relatively distinct patient groups exists:   16.  Roos H, Lissoos I. Penis lengthening. Int J Aesthetic Restorative Surg 1994;2:89‑96.
          those who present with a real hypoplasia and those cases   17.  Horton CE, Vorstman B, Teasley D, Winslow B. Hidden penis release:
                                                                  adjunctive suprapubic lipectomy. Ann Plast Surg 1987;19:131‑4.
          of body dismorphic  disorder. The former tend to show   18.  Alter GJ, Salgado CJ, Chim H. Aesthetic surgery of the male genitalia. Semin
          higher  degrees  of  satisfaction  and understand easily  the   Plast Surg 2011;25:189‑95.
            32                                                          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 1 ||  Jan 15, 2015
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48