Page 67 - Read Online
P. 67

Disease does not always negatively affect subjective   6.   Abdullah MS, Rock WP. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need in 5,112
          perceptions of well‑being, and even when it does, its impact   Malaysian children using the IOTN and DAI indices. Community Dent Health
          depends on expectations, preferences, material, social and   7.   2001;18:242‑8.
                                                                  Abdullah MS, Rock WP. Perception of dental appearance using Index of
          psychological resources and more importantly, socially and   Treatment Need (Aesthetic Component) assessments.  Community Dent
                              [9]
          culturally derived values.  What is considered aesthetically   Health 2002;19:161‑5.
          pleasing in one culture will often not match that which is   8.   Abu Alhaija ES, Al‑Nimri KS, Al‑Khateeb SN. Orthodontic treatment need
          thought of as aesthetically pleasing in another. Thus, the   and demand in 12‑14‑year‑old north Jordanian school children. Eur J Orthod
                                                                  2004;26:261‑3.
          lack of perceived need in the population evaluated might   9.   Mandall NA, McCord JF, Blinkhorn AS, Worthington HV, O’Brien KD.
          be because this rural population probably does not have   Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self‑perceptions in
          the same notions of beauty as their British peers, where the   14‑15‑year‑old Asian and Caucasian children in greater Manchester. Eur J
                                                                  Orthod 2000;22:175‑83.
          index was developed. The level of education may also be a   10.  Marques LS, Pordeus IA, Ramos‑Jorge ML, Filogônio CA, Filogônio CB, Pereira LJ,
          factor influencing perceived treatment need and demand. [18]  Paiva SM. Factors associated with the desire for orthodontic treatment among
                                                                  Brazilian adolescents and their parents. BMC Oral Health 2009;9:34.
          It is possible that subjects replied defensively and   11.  Farrow  AL,  Zarrinnia  K,  Azizi  K.  Bimaxillary  protrusion  in  black
          subconsciously trying to allocate themselves to the     Americans – an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J
          attractive side in order to avoid treatment. Alternatively   Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:240‑50.
          since each picture shows the dentition only from the   12.  Polk MS Jr, Farman AG, Yancey JA, Gholston LR, Johnson BE, Regennitter FJ.
          front, it is possible that the patients could not differentiate   Soft tissue profile: a survey of African‑American preference. Am J Orthod
                                                                  Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:90‑101.
          between some features of malocclusion as increased overjet   13.  Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese
          and deep bite and subsequently they could not score. It   population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:1‑7.
          might be that patients could not estimate the malocclusion   14.  Claudino D, Traebert J. Malocclusion, dental aesthetic self‑perception and
          and subsequently could not classify the teeth in any    quality of life in a 18 to 21 year‑old population: a cross section study. BMC
                                                                  Oral Health 2013;13:3.
          of these grades. Further, it is likely that the IOTN is not   15.  Badran SA. The effect of malocclusion and self‑perceived aesthetics on the
          sensitive enough to account for all types of malocclusion as   self‑esteem of a sample of Jordanian adolescents. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:638‑44.
          Class III, open bite, cross bite and scissors bite. [29]  16.  Shaw WC. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Eur J
                                                                  Orthod 1981;3:151‑62.
          Epidemiological  analysis  of  the  prevalence  of  various  oral   17.  Hamamci  N,  Basaran  G, Uysal  E. Dental  Aesthetic Index scores and
          health problems has evidenced an enormous lack of data   perception of personal dental appearance among Turkish university students.
                                                                  Eur J Orthod 2009;31:168‑73.
          related to malocclusion. This is due to the accumulated   18.  Bernabé E,  Flores‑Mir  C.  Normative  and  self‑perceived  orthodontic
          treatment needs of the problems of caries and periodontal   treatment need of a Peruvian university population. Head Face Med 2006;2:22.
          disease, an issue that is strongly correlated to the current   19.  Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Perception of personal dental appearance in young
          healthcare model as well as to the inequality in access to   adults: relationship between occlusion, awareness, and satisfaction. Am J
          healthcare services. Thus, those responsible for planning   Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:234‑41.
          orthodontic treatment in both the public and private sector   20.  Espeland LV, Stenvik A, Medin L. Concern for dental appearance among
                                                                  young adults in a region with non‑specialist orthodontic treatment. Eur J
          should concern themselves with the desires of the community   Orthod 1993;15:17‑25.
          as well as with the large body of evidence that supports the   21.  Pietilä T, Pietilä I. Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed
          importance of facial characteristics in the lives of individuals.  by 15‑16‑year‑old adolescents in eastern Finland. Community Dent Health
                                                                  1996;13:139‑44.
          In  summary,  further  studies  are  required  to  improve  our   22.  Mugonzibwa  EA,  Kuijpers‑Jagtman  AM,  van’t  Hof  MA,  Kikwilu  EN.
          understanding of self‑perceived need for orthodontic treatment,   Comparison between the opinions of Tanzanian parents and their children
                                                                  on dental attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2004;74:63‑70.
          especially in developing countries where different factors than   23.  Albino JE, Lawrence SD, Tedesco LA. Psychological and social effects of
          those reported in North American and European countries   orthodontic treatment. J Behav Med 1994;17:81‑98.
          could be influencing the demand and delivery of orthodontic   24.  Abdullah MS, Rock WP. Perception of dental appearance using Index of Treatment
                                                                  Need (Aesthetic Component) assessments. Community Dent Health 2002;19:161‑5.
          care. It may even be necessary to use more than one index in   25.  Tsakos G. Combining normative and psychosocial perceptions for assessing
          an epidemiological study to gather all the required information.  orthodontic treatment needs. J Dent Educ 2008;72:876‑85.
          The conclusions derived from  this  study are  of   26.  Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment
                                                                  priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309‑20.
          considerable importance for Indian policy makers in their   27.  Onyeaso  CO, Arowojolu  MO. Perceived, desired, and normatively
          work with  planning and implementing  public oral health   determined orthodontic treatment needs among orthodontically untreated
          strategies for the rural population of this age group.  Nigerian adolescents. West Afr J Med 2003;22:5‑9.
                                                              28.  Oshagh M, Salehi P, Pakshir H, Bazyar L, Rakhshan V. Associations between
                                                                  normative and self‑perceived orthodontic treatment needs in young‑adult
          REFERENCES                                              dental patients. Korean J Orthod 2011;41:440‑6.
                                                              29.  Aikins EA, Dacosta OO, Onyeaso CO, Isiekwe MC. Orthodontic treatment
          1.   Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Richmond S. Quality control in orthodontics: factors   need and complexity among Nigerian adolescents in Rivers State, Nigeria.
             influencing the receipt of orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J 1991;170:66‑8.  Int J Dent 2011;2011:813525.
          2.   Burden DJ. The influence of social class, gender, and peers on the uptake of   30.  Abu Alhaija ES, Al‑Nimri KS, Al‑Khateeb SN. Self‑perception of malocclusion
             orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:199‑203.  among north Jordanian school children. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:292‑5.
          3.   Perillo L, Esposito M, Caprioglio A, Attanasio S, Santini AC, Carotenuto M.
             Orthodontic treatment need for adolescents in the Campania region: the   How to cite this article: Marya CM, Rekhi A, Nagpal R, Oberoi SS,
             malocclusion impact on self‑concept. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014;8:353‑9.  Dhingra C. Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion in 16-24 year-
          4.   de Paula Júnior DF, Santos NC, da Silva ET, Nunes MF, Leles CR. Psychosocial impact   old adults in the rural areas of India. Plast Aesthet Res 2014;1:58-61.
             of dental esthetics on quality of life in adolescents. Angle Orthod 2009;79:1188‑93.  Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
          5.   Burden DJ, Pine CM. Self‑perception of malocclusion among adolescents.   Received: 15-05-2014; Accepted: 08-07-2014
             Community Dent Health 1995;12:89‑92.
          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 1 || Issue 2 ||  Sep 2014                                                61
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72