Page 96 - Read Online
P. 96

based on our own experience in treating advanced   microsurgical techniques are used.
            recurrent tumor with neck involvement, that the major
            complication rate may be significantly different when   Financial support and sponsorship
            only a local recurrence is surgically treated or by contrast   Nil.
            when a loco-regional or regional recurrence with neck
            involvement is managed [Figure 3]. Most of our recurrent   Conflicts of interest
            patients have been previously treated by primary surgery   There are no conflicts of interest.
            with local excision and cervical neck dissection followed
            or not by loco-regional radiotherapy. The effect of   REFERENCES
            prior operation and/or irradiation is determinant in
            the absence of anatomical layers or boundaries, which   1.   Lin YC, Hsiao JR, Tsai ST. Salvage surgery as the primary treatment for
            makes salvage surgery of the neck completely different   recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2004;40:183-9.
            from that performed in the primary treatment. Even,   2.   Gleich LL, Ryzenman J, Gluckman JL, Wilson KM, Barrett WL,
            it is not uncommon among our recurrent patients to    Redmond KP. Recurrent advanced (T3 or T4) head and neck
            encounter advanced tumors in which diffuse invasion is   squamous cell carcinoma: is salvage possible? Arch Otolaryngol Head
            present, with invasion of major vascular structures such   3.   Neck Surg 2004;130:35-8.
                                                                  Schwartz GJ, Mehta RH, Wenig BL, Shaligram C, Portugal LG. Salvage
            as the internal jugular vein and surrounding musculature,   treatment for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
            which subsequently makes surgery much more difficult   Head Neck 2000;22:34-41.
            and hazardous, with potential severe complications such   4.   Kowalski LP. Results of salvage treatment of the neck in patients with
            as massive bleeding from big cervical vessels.        oral cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:58-62.
                                                              5.   Agra IM, Carvalho AL, Ulbrich FS, de Campos OD, Martins EP, Magrin
                                                                  J, Kowalski LP. Prognostic factors in salvage surgery for recurrent oral
            Thus, based on previous series and on our own experience,   and oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 2006;28:107-13.
            we believe that: (1) overall complication rate for salvage   6.   Koo BS, Lim YC, Lee JS, Choi EC. Recurrence and salvage treatment of
            surgery is higher than that for primary surgery; (2) major   squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol 2006;42:789-94.
            complications rate does not seem to be statistically   7.   Brown JS, Blackburn TK, Woolgar JA, Lowe D, Errington RD, Vaughan
            different for salvage surgery; and (3) major complication   ED, Rogers SN. A comparison of outcomes for patients with oral
                                                                  squamous cell carcinoma at intermediate risk of recurrence treated
            rate and postoperative mortality from salvage surgery   by surgery alone or with post-operative radiotherapy. Oral Oncol
            does not seem to differ from that observed for advanced   2007;43:764-73.
            stages III/IV primary OSCC, but this should not be   8.   Liao CT, Chang JT, Wang HM, Ng SH, Hsueh C, Lee LY, Lin CH, Chen
            extensible to early stage tumors (I/II) treated primarily by   IH, Huang SF, Cheng AJ, Yen TC. Salvage therapy in relapsed squamous
            surgery, in which major complications are being expected   cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: how and when? Cancer 2008;112:94-
                                                                  103.
            in a lower rate.                                  9.   Lim YC, Choi EC. Surgery alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the
                                                                  oral cavity: survival rates, recurrence patterns, and salvage treatment.
            Also, the influence of long-term radiation toxicity derived   Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:1132-7.
            from its postoperative administration in the primary   10.  Kernohan MD, Clark JR, Gao K, Ebrahimi A, Milross CG. Predicting
            treatment and/or following salvage surgery may determine   the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma after first recurrence.
                                                                  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136:1235-9.
            the appearance of xerostomia, osteo-radionecrosis of the   11.  Sklenicka S, Gardiner S, Dierks EJ, Potter BE, Bell RB. Survival analysis
            jaws or restricted mouth opening and lingual movements,   and risk factors for recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma: does
            which may add its deleterious effects to those derived   surgical salvage affect outcome? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:1270-5.
            from surgery. Even, despite the performance of free   12.  Kostrzewa JP, Lancaster WP, Iseli TA, Desmond RA, Carroll
                                        [16]
            flap reconstruction, up to 25-50%  of the patients may   WR, Rosenthal EL. Outcomes of salvage surgery with free flap
            require a permanent gastrotomy because of feeding     reconstruction for recurrent oral and oropharyngeal cancer.
                                                                  Laryngoscope 2010;120:267-72.
            impairment, although these considerations concerning   13.  Goto M, Hanai N, Ozawa T, Hirakawa H, Suzuki H, Hyodo I, Kodaira
            sequelae are beyond the scope of the present paper.   T, Ogawa T, Fujimoto Y, Terada A, Kato H, Hasegawa Y. Prognostic
                                                                  factors and outcomes for salvage surgery in patients with recurrent
            In summary, with an overall 26% recurrence rate for OSCC   squamous  cell  carcinoma  of  the  tongue.  Asia  Pac  J  Clin  Oncol
                                                                  2016;12:141-8.
            despite primary treatment with surgery followed by post-  14.  Cooney TR, Poulsen MG. Is routine follow-up useful after combined-
            operative radiotherapy, the clinician must be firmly aware   modality therapy for advanced head and neck cancer? Arch Otolaryngol
            of recurrence, which is mainly a local relapse in more than   Head Neck Surg 1999;125:379-82.
            47% of the cases, followed by a regional recurrence in   15.  Goodwin WJ Jr. Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous
            35% and a combined loco-regional relapse in almost 11%   cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends
                                                                  justify the means. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1-18.
            of the cases. While chemotherapy is clearly discouraging   16.  Dziegielewski PT, Ho ML, Rieger J, Singh P, Langille M, Harris JR,
            and radiotherapy has only been reported to be curative in   Seikaly H. Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation and free flap
            no more than a 20%, salvage surgery is the best option for   reconstruction: objective functional outcomes and systematic review
            the treatment of recurrent OSCC patients, also for those   of the literature. Laryngoscope 2013;123:140-5.
            with advanced disease, with a mean 5-year overall-survival   17.  Zafereo ME, Hanasono MM, Rosenthal DI, Sturgis EM, Lewin JS,
            rate of more than 40% of the cases, showing acceptable   Roberts DB, Weber RS. The role of salvage surgery in patients
                                                                  with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Cancer
            morbidity and good functional results if reconstructive   2009;115:5723-33.
            196                                                                Plast Aesthet Res || Volume 3 || June 24, 2016
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101