Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

a combined local triangular full-thickness skin graft. Color match, quality of the scar, presence
                  of necrosis, dehiscence of the suture or tendon exposure were recorded and analyzed. Results:
                  One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing RFFF harvesting were included.
                                                         2
                                                                 2
                  RFFF donor site defects ranged from 15 cm  to 70 cm ; 9 patients (7%) had small dehiscences of
                  the forearm skin graft, whereas 2 cases (1.6%) presented tendon exposure. Otherwise, partial skin
                  graft loss occurred in a few patients. In all cases, these sites healed secondarily by conservative
                  management, with no final impairment of function. Assessment of the forearm donor site at 1
                  to 3 months after the primary surgical procedure showed complete defect coverage, good color
                  match, and no scarring along the graft line. Conclusion: The “Iberic graft” is a reliable method
                  for closing most of RFFF donor site defects as it provides excellent color match and pliability,
                  while obviates the need for a second surgical site.

                  Key words:
                  Radial forearm free flap; donor site morbidity; full-thickness skin graft; “Iberic graft”



            INTRODUCTION                                      article, we analyzed the results (esthetics and function)
                                                              using the Iberic graft.
                                                 [1]
            Since its introduction in 1981 by Yang et al.  the radial
            forearm free flap (RFFF) has been used extensively  for   METHODS
            reconstruction of head and neck defects after oncologic
                                                                                               [27]
            resection. However, many donor site complications have   As described by González-García et al.,  the design of
            been  described, such as partial loss of the  skin graft,   the RFFF begins by outlining the course of the dominant
            sensory  disturbance,  tendon exposure,  and esthetic   subcutaneous veins and the palpable pulse of the radial
            pitfalls. [2-5]  Direct closure is not often possible due to too-  artery. The flap is elevated in a subfascial layer in a few
            large defects or insufficient skin laxity. [6-8]  cases and in  a supra-fascial layer  in  other  cases.  The
                                                              superficial branch of the radial nerve is preserved in all
            Several  techniques  have been  described for adequate   cases. The basis for the design of the Iberic graft is the
            closure of the donor site defect after RFFF harvesting,   geometric concept of the designed skin paddle and the
            such as purse-string closure,  split-thickness skin grafts   local FTSGs. Thus, a quadrangular or rectangular radial
                                    [9]
            (STSGs), [10,11]  full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs), [12-15]    forearm flap is outlined on the distal forearm. A double
            tissue expansion, [16,17]  closure with local flaps, [18-20]  cross-  curvilinear line is outlined from the proximal portion of
            suturing,  use of artificial dermis, [22,23]  and local fascial   the RFFF to the proximal forearm to provide Access to the
                    [21]
            flaps.   STSGs  are  most  commonly  used.  FTSGs can   proximal portion of the neurovascular pedicle; this double
                 [24]
            be used to provide a thicker coverage of the defect;   curvilinear line allows the design of 2 opposed arcs. Then,
            they are more resistant to contractures or trauma and   2 bowstrings are outlined within the concavities of the
            provide better  esthetics  results.  However, their  main   arcs. At the midpoint of each bowstring, a perpendicular
            disadvantages are  potential increased morbidity  and   dotted line is outlined to the midpoint of each arc. This
            occasional need for an STSG to close the second donor   perpendicular dotted line is half the width of the RFFF
            site.  Those patients in whom the skin graft is harvested   donor defect and no longer than 3.5 cm to allow direct
                [25]
            from the thigh can develop several other complications,   closure of the forearm skin flaps. At this point, 4 isosceles
            such as pain, infection, and hypertrophic scar formation.   triangles are depicted [Figure 1]. Subsequent triangular
            Moreover,  evident  color mismatch  is  often  present  in   FTSGs are harvested and freed from the forearm. Silk
            relation to the surrounding forearm skin.  In addition,   sutures are used to join the FTSGs to the borders of the
                                               [26]
            avoiding a second surgical site might be a valuable aspect   defect and resorbable sutures are used to join 1 skin
            to consider to decrease postoperative complication rates.  triangle to another. Then, the FTSGs are covered with a
                                                              sponge using a tie-bolster technique and dressed with
            To avoid complications  at the donor  site from RFFF   regular gauzes with nitrofuran (Furacin 2 mg/g; LAB-
                                                                                                ®
            harvesting, such as color mismatch and secondary donor   SEID ,  Barcelona, Spain) and protected in  a forearm
                                                                  ®
            site morbidity, a new technique named ‘‘Iberic graft’’   splint for 10 days.
            for covering  the  RFFF donor site  based  on  the  use  of
            combined local FTSG triangles within a geometric model   RESULTS
            concept was described by the authors’ group in 2009. [27]
                                                              One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients
            Since its description, we have used this technique for   underwent RFFF harvesting for head and neck
            covering  the  RFFF  donor  site  in  125  patients.  In  this   reconstruction  since  the  first  case.  Primary  closure  of
            198                                                                Plast Aesthet Res || Volume 3 || June 24, 2016
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78