Page 39 - Read Online
P. 39

[1]
         In the International Classification of Diseases [9th revision-  aspiration. Pindborg et al.  found an incidence of 38% tongue
         World Health Organization (WHO)], oral cancer is classified   involvement in OSMF, which precludes its use. Bilateral free
         under the rubrics 140 (lip), 141 (tongue), 143 (gingiva), 144   radial artery forearm free flaps require micro vascular expertise,
         (floor of the mouth), and 145 (other parts of the mouth). Oral   the flaps are hairy and 40% of patients require secondary de-
         precancer is distinguished by WHO into “precancerous lesions”   bulking procedures. Extraction of third molar tooth is required
         (e.g. leukoplakia, erythroplakia) and “precancerous conditions”   to avoid flap inclination between teeth.
                                            [31]
         (e.g. oral sub mucous fibrosis, lichen planus).  The treatment
         of these suspicious precancerous lesions involve wide excision   Chemically, bovine collagen is very similar to the human form.
         followed by grafting of the surgical sites. Depending on the   This is crucial, as the human immune system will reject everything
         status of metastasis of established malignancies, resection of   that deviates too much from its own proteins. For these reasons,
         affected area and radical neck dissection followed by adjuvant   collagen sheets are well qualified for use as an effective wound
                                                                  [7]
         radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy may be required. In   cover.  Bovine collagen contain mostly type I and III collagen,
         the surgery of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), bilateral fibrotic   packed in a neutral glass vial of sterile preservative mixture of
         bands are excised with or without bilateral coronoidectomy or   isopropyl alcohol and water sterilized with ethylene oxide and
         temporalis myotomy.                                 are available in different sizes for clinical application. The freeze-
                                                             dried form of collagen is also available so that there is no need to
         In all such cases, wounds left uncovered are prone to infection,   treat the membrane in normal saline before application. Meshed
         contraction, and scarring with other clinical complications.   collagen membrane in wet form, porous collagen dressing
         Raw wounds of the oral cavity, like any other wounds, heal by   and collagen film dressings are also available.  Wet collagen
                                                                                                  [6]
         epithelialization and granulation. However, in the oral cavity the   membrane comes in varying in dimensions of 10 cm × 10 cm,
         healing of raw wounds presents some special problems. The   10 cm × 25 cm and 25 cm × 25 cm with thickness of 0.6 mm. [35]
         environment is always moist with contamination from salivary
         secretion and food ingestion. This, compounded by poor oral   Collagen covers sensitive nerve endings, thereby diminishing
         hygiene and constant movements of the cheek and tongue   degree of pain in raw wounds. Initially collagen adheres due to
         and masticatory forces, may interfere with graft adherence and   fibrin collagen interaction and later by fibrovascular ingrowth
         acceptance. The risk of infection in the oral cavity is also quite   into the collagen. All collagen membranes, with time, slowly
         high, which may result in scarring and contraction. The oral cavity   undergo collagenolysis and get eventually sloughed off. [1]
         is highly sensitive to any residual scarring, which may undergo
         ulceration and could be a constant source of irritation to patients   The advantages of collagen sheet as a wound dressing material
         wearing dentures. Hence, a need arises to use a biologic cover to   in surgery precancerous and cancerous lesions of oral soft tissues
         prevent these complications. [32]                   include the easy availability of collagen sheet, convenience of
                                                             application, good tolerance of oral tissue, no adverse effects
         Free split-skin graft and free mucosal graft have been used to   of the use of this membrane, obviation of second surgery to
         cover raw wounds in the oral cavity. The use of these grafts   obtain graft or detachment of the pedicle, there is no morbidity
         required a separate surgical procedure with associated technical   associated with the use of grafts, and there are no problems
         difficulties. The color and texture of skin do not conform totally   associated  with  donor  site  healing. [34,36]   No  threat  of  human
         to the oral cavity. Also seen is the growth of adnexal structures   immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis infections is associated with
         such as hair and sweat glands. In elderly persons the skin is   collagen, as the bovine material is obtained from countries free
         atrophic and inelastic, making it unsuitable. Mucosal grafts offer   of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and has a long shelf-life
         the best solution because they come nearest to fulfilling the   under normal storage conditions. [7]
         requirements of an ideal graft material, which include the ability
         to replace lost structures and the ability to induce the formation   OSMF is an insidious chronic disabling disease involving
         of such tissues. Donor sites for mucous graft are limited, and   oral mucosa, oropharynx and rarely larynx characterized by
         there is always morbidity associated with donor-site healing. The   juxtaepithelial inflammatory reaction followed by progressive
         oral environment and its constant movements are impediments   fibrosis of the lamina propria and deeper connective tissues
         to graft acceptance.  Other reconstructive options which have   with concomitant muscle degeneration. Although vesicle
                        [32]
         been used in the past include nasolabial flaps, transposition of   formation is an early sign, patient’s usual complaint will
         the buccal pad of fat, dorsal tongue flap, radial forearm flaps,   barely be burning sensation and inability to have hot and spicy
         flaps of the temporalis fascia/muscle or both, palatal island flaps   food. In the later stages, it shows a tendency for progressive
         to cover surgical defects, each having their own advantages and   fibrosis, leading to gradual reduction in mouth opening which
         shortcomings. [33,34]  Use of island palatal flap has limitation such as   hinders the function. [37,38]  Management of trismus in OSMF is
         its involvement with fibrosis and second molar tooth extraction   extremely challenging because of the nature of the disease,
         is required for flap cover without tension. Bilateral palatal flaps   making the oral mucosa prone to contraction causing a
         leave a large raw area on palatal bones. Sometimes the defect   significant reduction in the interincisal opening that was
                                                                                           [1]
         created may be large and local flaps may not be able to cover the   achieved with surgery. Nataraj et al.  performed a study in
         entire defect. A nasolabial flap is too short to cover the defect   which collagen was used to cover surgical defects of OSMF
         and causes visible scaring on the face and requires division at   in 15 cases and in other 15 cases, buccal pad of fat was used
         second stage. Tongue flaps have been used to cover the buccal   for the same. They found that the use of collagen membrane
         defects but were found to be bulky and needed additional   following excision of fibrotic bands in the management of oral
         surgery for detachment. Bilateral tongue flaps can cause severe   submucous fibrosis, though statistically not significant gave
         dysphagia and disarticulation and carry the risk of postoperative   better results with respect to post operative mouth opening
         102                                                                        Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 3 || Mar 23, 2016
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44