Page 69 - Read Online
P. 69

The authors report two cases of ulnar nerve injury   was performed on the 4th and 5th digits. The hand was
          proximal  to the  elbow: a  double  end‑to‑side  coaptation   casted for immobilization, and the elbow was maintained
          through a nerve graft allowed axons from the donor   in semi‑extended position for 20  days, followed by
          median nerve to rehabilitate the recipient ulnar nerve   progressive elbow mobilization.
          (a  surgically induced Martin  Gruber  anastomosis).  This   The Highet‑Zachary scheme was applied  for motor
          model  was  recently  proposed by  Kayikcioglu  et  al.   and   evaluation, and a modification of Mackinnon  et al. [1]
                                                      [9]
          Magdi Sherif and Amr.  In our cases, proximal ulnar   Sensory recovery scale was used with static and moving
                              [10]

          nerve repair was performed through a long traditional   2‑point discrimination test.  Early  (20  days) protective
          nerve graft by end‑to‑end coaptation in the  former, and   sensation recovery was registered, but the 36‑month
          by neurolysis in the latter. In both cases, a Zancolli lasso   and 6‑year follow‑up showed poor outcomes both for
          procedure was added distally. Our results are compared to   sensation (S1) and motion (M0).
          six  cases  that  were  previously  published  and the  effects
          of injury type, time  from the  initial  trauma,  surgical   Case 2
          techniques, and future perspectives are discussed.  A 46‑year‑old  man presented with proximal ulnar nerve
                                                              injuries  following  a high  voltage  injury  to  the  upper
          CASE REPORT                                         third of his left forearm. Three months after trauma, an
                                                              electrophysiological study was performed which showed
          Case 1                                              the  absent  motor  and sensory  potentials.  An  extensive
          A 22‑year‑old man,  a hand worker,  presented  with   surgical exposure and external neurolysis were performed
          proximal  left  ulnar nerve  injury.  He  was  found to  have   together  with distal babysitting technique.  The terminal
          head trauma and an open contaminated wound of the left   branch of the cutaneous medialis antebrachii was taken
          elbow with more than 12 cm of missing ulnar nerve. The   during ulnar exposure, and it was used as bridge graft
          wound was  found to be  contaminated  with  Actinobacter   without nerve stimulation; a Zancolli lasso procedure was
          baumanii. Extensive debridement of the wound was carried   also performed on the fourth and fifth digits.  After two
          out, and a cable graft from the sural nerve was performed   weeks,  sensory and motor rehabilitation  began  following
          1 month after. A small remnant of the cutaneous medialis   the same protocol applied to the first patient.
          antebrachii nerve was found  during scar  removal, and  it   Outcome  evaluation  was  performed  as  in  case  1.  Also in
          was used for the babysitting procedure.             this  case,  early protective sensation recovery  (24  days)
          At the distal third of the volar aspect of the forearm,   was registered at 12‑month follow‑up. This high‑voltage
          5  cm proximal to the distal palmar wrist crease, almost   injury showed good  results  (S5 and M4)  at 12‑month
          4  cm of both the median and the ulnar nerve were   follow‑up.
          exposed  [Figure  1]. On both trunks, an epiperineural
          window  was created on both the sides containing    DISCUSSION AND REVIEW
          motor  fascicles,  the  palmar  ulnar  side  of  the  median
          nerve and the palmar radial side of the ulnar nerve,   Denervation after  nerve  injury  is  known to cause
          respectively  (no stimulation was used). The 2 windows   important structural and functional changes within skeletal
          were connected through the graft obtained  from  the   muscle, and long‑term  denervation with improper axonal
          cutaneous antebrachii, which was sutured to the main   recruitment  has shown to produce atrophy of the end
          trunks with 2 11‑0 nylon sutures on each side [Figure 2].
          Furthermore, the “lasso” procedure described by Zancolli






















                                                              Figure 2: On both trunks, an epiperineural window has been opened, on
                                                              both the sides containing motor fascicles, the palmar ulnar side of the
          Figure  1: Planning of the procedure: at the distal third of the volar   median nerve and the palmar radial side of the ulnar nerve, respectively.
          aspect of the forearm, 5 cm proximal to the distal palmar wrist crease,   The two windows have been connected through a cross graft of the
          almost 4 cm of both the median (red arrow) and the ulnar (black arrow)   cutaneous antebrachii,  which was sutured  (arrows) to the  main  trunks
          nerve are exposed (label median and ulnar nerve)    with two 11‑0 nylon sutures on each side (label)
          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 4 || Jul 15, 2015                                             209
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74