Page 68 - Read Online
P. 68

Topic: Peripheral Nerve Repair and Regeneration




          “Babysitting” procedures in proximal nerve


          trunk injuries: two case reports and a

          review





          Michele R. Colonna , Antonio Russo , Mariarosaria Galeano , Gabriele Delia ,
                                                                              3
                                                                                                1
                                1
                                                   2
          Giorgio E. Pajardi , Francesco Stagno d’Alcontres        1
                              4
          1 Department of Experimental Specialistic Medical and Surgical Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Messina, 98121 Messina, Italy.
          2 Department Hand Surgery, Multimedica Hospital, 20122 Milan, Italy.
          3 Department of Surgical Specialties, University Hospital of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
          4 Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
          Address for correspondence: Prof. Michele R. Colonna, Department of Experimental Specialistic Medical and Surgical Sciences and
          Odontostomatology, University of Messina, 98121 Messina, Italy. E-mail: mrcolonna1@gmail.com

                ABSTRACT
                One of the most important goals in treating proximal nerve injuries is to maintain the function of distal
                effectors during axonal regeneration.  “Babysitting”, that is, connecting the injured nerve to a healthy
                trunk provides a bypass for distal neural regeneration or reactivation. It avoids degeneration of sensory
                and motor terminations, with minimal donor nerve damage. We present a technique where a nerve
                graft is used between ulnar and median nerve through two end-to-side sutures in the distal third of
                the forearm, in two different cases of proximal ulnar nerve injury. Both patients were young manual
                workers, the former suffered a total nerve disruption proximal to the elbow following a car accident
                and the latter suffered a perineurial scar from a high voltage injury at the proximal third of the forearm.
                The proximal injury was grafted with a sural nerve in the former and treated by neurolysis in the latter.
                Results were graded by the Highet-Zachary scale for both sensory and motor recovery. The outcomes
                of our series were compared to six other case reports in the literature (including median nerves) treated
                with this  technique. Both  clinical  and  experimental data  show  that babysitting effectively protects
                distal effectors.
                Key words:
                Denervation, end-to-side neural repair, Martin Gruber anastomosis, nerve graft, sensory recovery


          INTRODUCTION                                        employed  to bring new axons into distal effectors in
                                                                      [3]
                                                              case of proximal nerve trunk injury to avoid distal effector
          Proximal nerve injuries  are well‑known to produce   degeneration. End‑to‑side nerve repair is a microsurgical
          atrophy of the  distal effectors. This is  evident in injuries   technique in which nerve fibers are transferred from
          of major nerve trunks in the upper limb. The ulnar nerve   an intact donor nerve to a denervated recipient nerve
          has shown to have the  lowest regenerative  rate. [1,2]  Distal   directly or through a bridge graft. [4‑7]  Although the value of
          neurotization  through end‑to‑side  coaptation has been   end‑to‑side coaptation is debated in the literature, good
                                                              functional results can be achieved when this technique is
                                                              applied with special care to the donor nerve. [6]
                         Access this article online
                                                                                              [5]
               Quick Response Code:                           The  “babysitter”  procedure  combines   cross‑facial nerve
                                   Website:                   grafting  with the segmental  transfer of the hypoglossal
                                   www.parjournal.net
                                                              nerve to the affected facial nerve. This technique  has
                                                              shown satisfactory to excellent results. In long‑lasting
                                   DOI:                       paralysis, nonetheless,  the  babysitter  procedure may
                                   10.4103/2347-9264.160888   need to be combined with muscle(s)  flap(s)  for enhanced
                                                              outcomes. [5,8]



           208                                                           Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 4 || Jul 15, 2015
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73