Page 28 - Read Online
P. 28

a                       b
                                                               a                        b









           c                       d                           c                        d
          Figure 2:  Technique  of palmar cutaneous nerve relocation to pronator   Figure 3: Technique  of relocation of dorsal branch of ulnar nerve
          quadratus. (a) Preoperative skin marking shows neuroma of the palmar   into ulna.  (a)  End neuroma of dorsal  branch of ulnar nerve; (b) nerve
          cutaneous branch of the  median  nerve; (b) dissection  of palmar   dissected proximally; (c) nerve end can be placed in the ostium in distal
          cutaneous nerve to origin from median nerve; (c)  nerve relocated  into   ulna without tension; (d) epineurium  is sutured to the periosteum to
          muscle; (d) suture securing epineurium to epimysium  prevent displacement of nerve end

          tunnel is dissected in the muscle, and the nerve is buried   than  50%  conduction  demonstrated  intraoperatively across
          without tension. A single absorbable suture between the   the nerve.  Opponents of neurolysis alone, however, warn
                                                                       [33]
          epineurium and epimysium holds the nerve in place. For   of the risks of segmental revascularization and significant
          placement into bone, a cortical hole is drilled obliquely to   scar  formation.  This  has led to the  development  of
                                                                           [34]
          a size slightly larger than the nerve diameter. The nerve   techniques  designed  to  prevent  recurrent  scarring  such  as
          is relocated into this hole, and a single suture holds the   wrapping the nerve in a variety of protective substances.
          epineurium  to  the  adjacent  periosteum  [Figure  3].  It  is
          important not to choose a site just distal to a joint where   Nerve wrapping
                                                                                           [35]
                                                                                                         [36]
          mobilization is likely to put strain on the nerve. It is also   First  described by  Masear  et al.,   vein wrapping   has
          crucial  to  ensure  there  are  no  kinks  or  tension  on  the   been reported as a successful technique in the management
          nerve and that it does not angle acutely on entering the   of both refractory cubital and carpal tunnel syndromes.
          bone. Our primary preferences for nerve relocation are   Initially, glutaraldehyde‑preserved allograft was used but
          as follows: (1) superficial radial nerve to the undersurface   has since been shown to cause increased scarring and
                                                                                                [37]
          of  brachioradialis  or  into  radius;  (2)  palmar  cutaneous   adherence  compared to  autograft vein.  Our unit  has
          branch of median nerve to pronator quadrates; (3) dorsal   not had success with either technique and our limited
          branch of ulnar nerve to pronator quadrates; (4)  lateral   experience  of  re‑exploration  in  these  cases  the  nerve  was
          cutaneous nerve of the forearm to pronator quadrates;   found to be tethered at both the proximal and distal sites
          (5) digital nerves at or distal to distal interphalangeal joint   on entry and exit of the vein graft. In general, we prefer to
          to the proximal phalanx; and  (6) digital nerves proximal   use vascularized fascia to wrap nerves. The largest series of
                                                                                                             [38]
          the distal interphalangeal joint to the metacarpal shaft.  vein wrapping to date has been reported by Kokkalis et al.
                                                              who performed the procedure on seventeen patients for
                                                              recalcitrant ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. Although
          SURGERY FOR NEUROMAS‑IN‑                            they reported a significant reduction in symptoms in most of
          CONTINUITY                                          the patients, pain was not abolished in any single case.

          There is an even greater debate in the management of   For neuromas involving the critical ulnar and median
          in‑continuity neuromas. The treatment options fall into the   nerves at the wrist or forearm, it has been our practice
          following broad categories: (a) neurolysis alone, (b) nerve   to use  local fascial flaps to wrap the  nerve,  occasionally
          wrapping,  (c)  neuroma resection and reconstruction,   incorporating overlying skin and fat. Our unit has
          and (d) neuroma resection and relocation.           previously presented results of the analysis of 14  cases
                                                              of neurolysis and fascial wrapping for nerves‑in‑continuity
          Neurolysis alone                                    of the  distal forearm  or wrist.   There  was a complete
                                                                                         [39]
          Preservation of functional sensitivity is vital for nerves   resolution of pain in  8 of the 14  patients,  and 2 more
          such as the median and ulnar nerves. In these situations,   patients  had only mild pain at 6 month follow‑up. This
          neurolysis alone or nerve  wrapping  usually  maintains the   technique was also used for the branches of the median
          integrity  of  the  intact  axonal  tissue.  External  neurolysis   and ulnar nerves to the palm and digits  in an effort to
          theoretically restores movement, thereby, preventing further   preserve distal sensation,  using division and relocation
          scar adherence to the nerve, a suggested trigger for pain. [31,32]    as a secondary procedure in  the  case of failure.  We
          A  study  of  neurolysis  alone  in  upper  trunk  brachial  plexus   have found that there is little functional loss with the
          neuroma‑in‑continuity revealed a functional improvement   relocation of these nerves and have had greater success in
          following neurolysis alone in cases where there was more   abolishing pain with this technique.

           168                                                           Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 4 || Jul 15, 2015
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33