Page 43 - Read Online
P. 43

Page 12 of 14         Calderwood et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2021;8:40  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.14

               cooperation is necessary to obtain good quality and useful scans.


               No studies were found to report a cost analysis of MRL compared to other imaging modalities for
               lymphoedema. It would be a future area of interest for determining the practicalities of using MRL and the
               cost versus benefit of MRL compared to lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green lymphography.


               CONCLUSION
               MRL is recognised as an accurate and safe imaging modality to visualize the lymphatic pathways. MRL can
               detect secondary changes in the skin and subcutaneous tissue, accurately demonstrate the extent and
               location of oedema, and provide a functional assessment of the lymphatic pathways. It is a valuable tool in
               diagnosing, classifying, staging, and identifying the cause of both primary and secondary lymphoedema. In
               addition, it has been reported useful for pre-operative planning and post-operative surveillance.


               Both contrast and non-contrast MRL scans have their strengths and weaknesses, and obtaining a
               combination of both heavily T2-weighted and post-contrast T1-weighted sequences is recommended by
               many articles as the optimal method for assessing lymphoedema. As MRL becomes increasingly used, we
               will likely learn the extent of its benefits and limitations and may potentially use it to enhance our
               knowledge of lymphoedema further.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Calderwood A, Ho-Shon K, Suami H
               Performed data acquisition, as well as provided editorial support: Thompson B

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               All figures were obtained copyright permission for use in this manuscript.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Mazzei FG, Gentili F, Guerrini S, et al. MR lymphangiography: a practical guide to perform it and a brief review of the literature from
                   a technical point of view. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:2598358.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               2.       Mitsumori LM, McDonald ES, Wilson GJ, Neligan PC, Minoshima S, Maki JH. MR lymphangiography: how I do it. J Magn Reson
                   Imaging 2015;42:1465-77.  DOI
               3.       Mazzei MA, Gentili F, Mazzei FG, et al. High-resolution MR lymphangiography for planning lymphaticovenous anastomosis
                   treatment: a single-centre experience. Radiol Med 2017;122:918-27.  DOI  PubMed
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48