Page 30 - Read Online
P. 30

Chen et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2021;8:36  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.33  Page 5 of 6

               Table 2. The characteristics between local and general anesthesia patients with lymphedemanular anastomosis
                N = 29                                          Anesthesia methods            P value
                                                  Local (n = 21)       General (n = 8)
                Sex (F/M)                         18:3                 7:1                    0.472
                Age (years)                       63.0                 57.63                  0.363
                ASA score                         3.45                 3.75                   0.682
                BMI                               27.89                26.63                  0.361
                OP times (hours)                  3.67                 5.19                   0.048
                Cancer (yes/no)                   17:4                 5:3                    0.045
                Risk factors (0-3)                0.85                 0.66                   0.052
                Reduction rate-immediate          2.025%               4.353%                 0.045
                Reduction rate-late               4.330%               5.707%                 0.052
                Follow-up (months)                8.4                  10                     -
                LVA number (n)                    7.095                6.75                   0.102
                Complications                     0                    0                      -
               BMI: Body mass index; Risk factors: BMI > 28, age > 65, autoimmune disease; LVA: lymphaticovenular anastomosis; ASA: American Society of
               Anesthesiologists.

               neural deficit, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, systemic sepsis, or septic shock, can be severe and are
               ideally avoided. Therefore, instead of general anesthesia, local anesthesia could be the resolution for LVA in
               patients with high ASA PS score to reduce the surgical morbidities. Therefore, general anesthesia should be
               preserved for vascularized lymphatic vessel transfer or lipectomy in the patient at high ASA PS score. In
               2020, Yoshida et al.  described local anesthesia is a practical choice of anesthesia in Fowler’s Position
                                [11]
               because of the lower invasiveness of LVA. In our study, we have 21 patient who receive ongoing oncological
               therapies. Among this study, local anesthesia does not decrease the numbers of lymphaticovenular
               anastomosis and neither compromises the reduction of limb circumferences at 3 months follow-up. Besides,
               there were no complications in our study. With LVA under local anesthesia, safety and effectiveness can
               both be achieved in advanced cancer patients with high ASA PS score (> 3).


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               Thanks to Professor Koshima Isao for leading me into the field of supermicrosurgery. I appreciated his
               kindness in my fellowship from April to October in 2020 at Hiroshima University Hospital of Japan.

               Authors’ contributions
               Completed all surgeries of these patients and wrote the article: Chen CC
               Helped in the data collection and patient care: Chen CC
               Helped to improve the article: Yang SF
               Helped in data analysis of the article: Chang CC

               Availability of data and materials
               Data will be deposited into data repositories or published as supplementary information in the journal.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35