Page 85 - Read Online

Page 10 of 10 Hammond et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:28 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.27

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.

REFERENCES
1. Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964-6.
DOI
2. Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi WJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to conventional surgical approaches
(laparoscopic or open): a systematic overview of reviews. Ann Surg 2021;273:467-73. DOI
3. Boyd B, Umansky J, Samson M, Boyd D, Stahl K. Robotic harvest of internal mammary vessels in breast reconstruction. J Reconstr
Microsurg 2006;22:261-6. DOI PubMed
4. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger CF. Robotic harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: laboratory and clinical experience. J Reconstr
Microsurg 2012;28:457-64. DOI PubMed
5. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1305-12.
DOI PubMed
6. Selber JC. The Robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:340-3. DOI PubMed
7. Struk S, Sarfati B, Leymarie N, et al. Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest: A feasibility study on cadaveric model. J Plast Reconstr
Aesthet Surg 2018;71:259-61. DOI
8. Elver AA, Matthews SA, Egan KG, et al. Characterizing outcomes of medial and lateral perforators in deep inferior epigastric
perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023;39:20-6. DOI
9. Shuck J, Asaad M, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Prospective pilot study of robotic-assisted harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: A
510(k) approval study with U.S. food and drug administration investigational device exemption. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:1287-
95. DOI
10. Winocour S, Tarassoli S, Chu CK, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Comparing outcomes of robotically assisted latissimus dorsi
harvest to the traditional open approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146:1221-5. DOI
11. Bishop SN, Asaad M, Liu J, et al. Robotic harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction: a case series.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:1073-7. DOI
12. Gillespie BM, Gillespie J, Boorman RJ, Granqvist K, Stranne J, Erichsen-Andersson A. The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team
performance: a systematic mixed studies review. Hum Factors 2021;63:1352-79. DOI
13. Egan KG, Selber JC. Modern innovations in breast surgery: robotic breast surgery and robotic breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg
2023;50:357-66. DOI PubMed
14. Fan CJ, Chien HL, Weiss MJ, et al. Minimally invasive versus open surgery in the Medicare population: a comparison of post-
operative and economic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3874-80. DOI
15. Eo PS, Kim H, Lee JS, Lee J, Park HY, Yang JD. Robot-assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest for partial breast reconstruction:
comparison with endoscopic and conventional approaches. Aesthet Surg J 2023;44:38-46. DOI
16. Lee MJ, Won J, Song SY, et al. Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: a
retrospective matched study. Front Oncol 2022;12:989231. DOI PubMed PMC
17. Khan MTA, Won BW, Baumgardner K, et al. Literature review: robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric flap for breast
reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022;89:703-8. DOI
18. Piper M, Ligh CA, Shakir S, Messa C, Soriano I, Kanchwala S. Minimally invasive robotic-assisted harvest of the deep inferior
epigastric perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74:890-930. DOI PubMed
19. Selber JC. Can I make robotic surgery make sense in my practice? Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:781e-92e. DOI
20. Williams SB, Prado K, Hu JC. Economics of robotic surgery: does it make sense and for whom? Urol Clin North Am 2014;41:591-6.
DOI PubMed