Page 17 - Read Online

Page 12 of 14 Olla et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:24 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.30

Author contributions
Contributed equally to the design, editing, review, and approval of the final manuscript: Olla D, Levy J,
Nelson JA, Allen RJ

Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship
This research was supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748, which supports
the research infrastructure at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The content is solely the
responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
The Institutional Review Board of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center approved this review, number
18-202. Patient informed consent has been obtained.

Consent for publication
No patient identifiers are included in these photos, so no consent is required.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.

REFERENCES
1. Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:524-41. DOI
2. Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:7S-13S. DOI PubMed
PMC
3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36
cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. DOI
4. Allen RJ, Mehrara BJ. Breast reconstruction. Plastic Surgery - Principles and Practice. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 535-64.
5. Nelson JA, Allen RJ Jr, Polanco T, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: an 8-
year examination of 3268 patients. Ann Surg 2019;270:473-83. DOI
6. Hartrampf CR, Jr. The transverse abdominal island flap for breast reconstruction. A 7-year experience. Clin Plast Surg 1988;15:703-
16. DOI PubMed
7. Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate
breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:828-41; discussion 842. DOI PubMed
8. Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994;32:32-8. DOI PubMed
9. Healy C, Allen RJ Sr. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr
Microsurg 2014;30:121-5. DOI PubMed
10. He WY, El Eter L, Yesantharao P, et al. Complications and patient-reported outcomes after TRAM and DIEP flaps: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8:e3120. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Hurteau JE, Bostwick J, Nahai F, Hester R, Jurkiewicz MJ. V-Y advancement of hamstring musculocuataneous flap for coverage of
ischial pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68:539-42. DOI PubMed
12. Angrigiani C, Grilli D, Thorne CH. The adductor flap: a new method for transferring posterior and medial thigh skin. Plast Reconstr
Surg 2001;107:1725-31. DOI PubMed
13. Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg
2012;129:16e-23e. DOI PubMed
14. Park JE, Alkureishi LWT, Song DH. TUGs into VUGs and friendly BUGs: transforming the gracilis territory into the best secondary
breast reconstructive option. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:447-54. DOI PubMed
15. Dayan JH, Allen RJ Jr. Lower extremity free flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:77S-86S. DOI PubMed
16. Jo T, Kim EK, Eom JS, Han HH. Comparison of transverse upper gracilis and profunda femoris artery perforator flaps for breast