Page 70 - Read Online
P. 70
Farajzadeh et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:32 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.24 Page 9 of 11
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and contributed significantly to
the writing of the study: Salibian AA
Performed data acquisition, literature review, and contributed significantly to the writing of the study, as
well as providing administrative, technical, and material support: Farajzadeh MM
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
Salibian AA is a research consultant for Abbvie, Inc. There were no internal or external funding sources for
this study. All other listed authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The UC Davis IRB Administration has reviewed the manuscript, and IRB review is not required. Consent
has been obtained for the use of images contained in the publication.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication has been obtained.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
REFERENCES
1. Holmström H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand
J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;13:423-27. DOI PubMed
2. Eltahir Y, Werners LLCH, Dreise MM, Zeijlmans van Emmichoven IA, Werker PMN, de Bock GH. Which breast is the best? Plast
Reconstr Surg 2015;135:43-50. DOI PubMed
3. Jeevan R, Browne JP, Gulliver-Clarke C, et al. Surgical determinants of patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy
reconstruction in women with breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:1036e-45e. DOI
4. Liu C, Zhuang Y, Momeni A, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/
implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument
BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;146:117-26. DOI
5. Pennington DG, Nettle WJ, Lam P. Microvascular augmentation of the blood supply of the contralateral side of the free transverse
rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 1993;31:123-6; discussion 126. DOI PubMed
6. Blondeel PN, Arnstein M, Verstraete K, et al. Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous
and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1295-9. DOI
7. Sadik KW, Pasko J, Cohen A, Cacioppo J. Predictive value of SIEV caliber and superficial venous dominance in free DIEP flaps. J
Reconstr Microsurg 2013;29:57-61. DOI PubMed
8. Galanis C, Nguyen P, Koh J, Roostaeian J, Festekjian J, Crisera C. Microvascular lifeboats: a stepwise approach to intraoperative
venous congestion in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:20-7. DOI PubMed
9. Sbitany H, Lentz R, Piper M. The "Dual-plane" DIEP flap: measuring the effects of superficial arterial and venous flow augmentation
on clinical outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019;35:411-6. DOI PubMed
10. Hembd A, Liu Y, Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Abandoning the SIEA flap for the dual-plane DIEP reduces fat necrosis and flap failure.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2023;151:958-68. DOI PubMed
11. Davies AJ, Emam AT, Colavitti G, Wilson S. The "Dual-plane" DIEP flap: measuring the effects of superficial arterial and venous
flow augmentation on clinical outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019;35:e1. DOI PubMed
12. Chu CK, Largo RD, Lee ZH, et al. Introduction of the L-PAP flap: bipedicled, conjoined, and stacked thigh-based flaps for autologous
breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023;152:1005e-10e. DOI