Page 66 - Read Online
P. 66

Page 12 of 14             Patel et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:20  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.17

               It is important to point out that many patients with a short nose require dorsal augmentation as well. When
               patients have a low nasal starting point, it can give the impression of a shorter nose. Using a radix graft can
               effectively increase the nasal length. In many cases, we may further reduce the dorsum to facilitate the
               placement of a new, continuous graft along the entire nasal dorsum. This method was used in many of the
               cases presented here .
                                [34]

               MANAGEMENT OF SOFT TISSUE AND MUCOSA
               The most significant factors affecting the correction of a short nasal deformity are the constraints in soft
               tissue and mucosa. A lack of pliability in vascularized external and internal lining will prevent lengthening
               regardless of well-structured grafts and positioning of the osseocartilaginous framework. Preoperative nasal
               exercises and skin stretching have been suggested as a means to increase soft tissue mobility through
               mechanical and potentially biological creep [35,36] . Despite the likely benefits of this, there are limited data on
               techniques and outcomes, which is further complicated by variability in skin types and participation among
               patients.


               In cases of severe skin damage, short of replacement, the use of nanofat-injected temporalis fascia
               purportedly improves skin texture, and we have found this to be anecdotally true. In severe cases of
               contracture or lack of viable nasal skin, the use of pedicled interpolated flaps (e.g., melolabial or forehead)
               may have to be considered as a means to introduce a healthy soft tissue envelope, though this should be
               done in a staged fashion [Figure 16].

               POSTOPERATIVE CARE
               To our knowledge, there are few studies, if any, that examine outcomes in such patients. Our care for such
               patients is centered on minimizing risks of skin necrosis and infection. As such, we advocate for the use of
               hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) in these patients. The number and frequency of dives we recommend
               varies from 3 postoperative dives to 5 pre and 10 postoperative dives (in cases of severely damaged skin
               envelopes). Studies examining the efficacy of HBO are underway. In addition, we recommend 7-10 days of
               antibiotic prophylaxis. Infection in these patients can be devastating, as the grafts placed are at risk. Some
                                                                                                    [37]
               have advocated for more radical antibiotic therapy in revision patients like these, including irrigation .

               CONCLUSIONS
               The excessively short nose is a complex anatomic dilemma, and its surgical management is dependent on
               consideration of etiology and detailed preoperative nasal examination with careful analysis of soft tissue
               limitations. In many cases, an increase in nasal length and projection with an accompanying decrease in
               rotation is required. Rhinoplasty techniques to achieve these goals often include a septal extension graft or
               anterior septal reconstruction, lower lateral cartilage repositioning with strut grafting, tip grafts, and
               occasionally composite grafts. Complete release of the soft tissue and ligaments from all bony and
               cartilaginous attachments is necessary for skin redraping. In all cases, it is crucial to consider the nose in the
               context of the entire face and to understand the surgically achievable results for each individual patient.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the design of this study, along with acquisition and interpretation of the
               data: Patel PN, Longino E, Most SP
               Contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript: Patel PN, Longino E, Most SP
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71