Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Chi et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:70                                     Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2023.89
                                                                                Aesthetic Research




               Commentary                                                                    Open Access



               Limited recovery following acellular nerve allograft
               reconstruction in major peripheral nerve injuries


               David Chi  , Anna Rose Johnson, Susan E. Mackinnon

               Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis,
               MO 63110, USA.
               Correspondence to: Prof. Susan E. Mackinnon, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of
               Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. E-mail: mackinnons@wustl.edu
               How to cite this article: Chi D, Johnson AR, Mackinnon SE. Limited recovery following acellular nerve allograft reconstruction in
               major peripheral nerve injuries. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:70. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2023.89
               Received: 25 Sep 2023  First Decision: 8 Nov 2023  Revised: 27 Nov 2023   Accepted: 11 Dec 2023  Published: 28 Dec 2023

               Academic Editor: Samuel O. Poore  Copy Editor: Yanbing Bai  Production Editor: Yanbing Bai


               Abstract
               Recent studies suggest that acellular nerve allografts (ANA) have similar efficacy as nerve autografts in certain
               applications of nerve surgery. However, multiple studies also demonstrate the limitations of nerve allografts,
               resulting in poor patient outcomes. This submission discusses a recent case series of patients who failed allograft
               use with subsequent histologic analyses of these allografts. Recommendations on the treatment of nerve gaps are
               presented, drawing from our current understanding of allograft and autograft utility in reconstruction. Factors taken
               into account include recipient critical nerve function, existent nerve gap, and nerve diameter.

               Keywords: Nerve reconstruction, peripheral nerve, acellular nerve allograft, nerve autograft



               The increasing use of acellular nerve allografts, nerve conduits, and nerve wraps in nerve reconstruction
               provides a potential new alternative to nerve repair and nerve autograft. Recent studies, most supported by
               industry, suggest that outcomes may be comparable between autografts and acellular nerve allografts
               (ANA) . However, a large study from Switzerland showed that ANA reconstruction resulted in poorer
                     [1,2]
               outcomes when used to reconstruct longer length motor nerve injuries. Specific details regarding individual
               use cases are often uncaptured in large cohorts, and more nuance is required to accurately interpret and
               implement these findings into clinical practice.







                           © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                        www.oaepublish.com/par
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78