Page 70 - Read Online
P. 70

Sears et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:31  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.04  Page 3 of 5

               Table 1. Summary of neural interfaces for prosthetic control that rely on nerve regeneration for prosthetic actuation
                                          Versatility for
                      Interfacing
                Method         Functionality neural   Summary
                      tissue              interfacing
                TMR   Skin     Motor      Upper Limb    The terminal end of a transected nerve reinnervates the intact proximal muscles.
                                                      High-density surface EMG electrode grids enable the recording of motor unit
                                                      activity across 64 channels
                RPNI  Skin Or   Motor and    Upper and    The transected nerve is divided into several subunits, each reinnervating a muscle
                      Muscle   Sensation  Lower Limb    graft harvested from a proximal donor site. This biological PNI can be recorded or
                                                      stimulated using transcutaneous or percutaneous electrodes. The number of
                                                      available recording and stimulating channels is defined by the number of nerve
                                                      subunits and the interface method
                Sieve   Fascicles  Motor and   Upper and    The flat, porous structure of sieve electrodes presents discrete microchannels to
                electrode      Sensation  Lower Limb   isolate regenerating axons of the transected nerve. Double-layering allows for 64
                                                      channels capable of recording and stimulating specific fascicles





























                Figure 1. Sieve electrodes contain multiple stimulation/recording channels with sufficient transit zones to allow axonal regeneration
                through, in both nerve coaptation (left) and amputation (right) models.

               flexibility of polyimide electrodes, micromotion can still erode signal fidelity and damage native tissue [15,16] .
               Additionally, any chronic implant can incite a harmful immune response . Millevolte et al. . utilized
                                                                                [16]
                                                                                                [17]
               surgical techniques to circumvent these mechanical limitations, housing sieve electrodes in the medullary
               canals of rabbits. Their Osseointegrated Neural Interface (ONI) generated somatosensory cortical responses
               at 12 weeks and improvements in recorded signal amplitude between weeks 3 and 5 . Overall, sieve
                                                                                           [17]
               electrodes present an exciting avenue for peripheral nerve interfaces, but their clinical implementation will
               require refined surgical methodology.


               The formation of functional connections between regenerative electrodes and damaged nerves to actuate
               robotic prostheses with high selectivity exemplifies the potential for nerves to innervate non-biological
               targets. If neural interfacing technology maintains this trajectory, these increasingly sophisticated devices
               will become progressively more relevant to plastic and reconstructive surgeons, who work with patients
               near the incidence of injury and often before any of these hypothetical devices would see implementation.
               While the technology for such devices is available, a defined surgical approach would facilitate their clinical
               application. To accommodate this forthcoming innovation, we posit expanding the definition of
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75