Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36

Page 6 of 8               Jonis et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:29  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2023.06

               benefits for patients? Do I foresee the application of this new device? Robotic assistance in microsurgery has
               the potential to improve current techniques to standardize care and support surgeons during surgery.
               Studies have shown that robot assistance is easier for inexperienced surgeons to master compared to
               conventional manual techniques and our current research supports this finding. Adopting an innovation
               such as robotic assistance in microsurgery will require incorporating robotic microsurgical training in the
               curriculum of plastic surgery residents.

               Surgeons have always been known to be innovators because the integration of new concepts into current
                                                    [31]
               surgical practices is a fundamental principle . So far, the field of robotic microsurgery is relatively new and
               RAMS represents a new enabling technology that has the capacity to advance microsurgery even further.
               However, to effectively disseminate innovation, it is essential to test the boundaries of the innovation. In the
               case of robotic assistance in microsurgery, large-scale quantitative data in the form of comparative
               randomized controlled trials are required.


               Currently, the 3rd generation of the MUSA is being developed, which will be commercially available. The
               new MUSA will be mounted on a wheeled cart and will facilitate the use of 3D digital microscopes.

               CONCLUSION
               The development of the MUSA robot, from its inception to the first clinical study, has produced
               encouraging results. However, its clinical value has not yet been evidenced on a large scale. Through
               randomized controlled trials, comparative studies, and cost-effectiveness analysis, the value of robotic
               assistance in microsurgery will become evident. When promising results are proven, it might facilitate the
               use of the MUSA robot in general practice.


               DECLARATIONS
               Author’s contributions
               Participated equally in this manuscript’s conception, design, drafting, writing, and revision: Jonis YMJ,
               Profar JJA, van Mulken TJM, Qiu S


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Tom J. M. van Mulken is a shareholder in the company Microsure. The other authors declare that they have
               no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41