Page 49 - Read Online

Inchauste. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:27 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.139 Page 13 of 15

4. Sultan SM, Greenspun DT. Lumbar artery perforator flaps in autologous breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2023;50:301-12. DOI
PubMed
5. Nguyen DH, Ma IT, Choi YK, Zak Y, Dua MM, Wapnir IL. Creating a biological breast implant with an omental fat-augmented free
flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:832-5. DOI PubMed
6. Broyles JM, Balk EM, Adam GP, et al. Implant-based versus autologous reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10:e4180. DOI PubMed PMC
7. Saldanha IJ, Broyles JM, Adam GP, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10:e4179. DOI PubMed PMC
8. Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg
2004;113:1153-60. DOI
9. Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic
coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:792-8. DOI PubMed
10. Pannucci CJ, Basta MN, Kovach SJ, et al. Loupes-only microsurgery is a safe alternative to the operating microscope: an analysis of
1,649 consecutive free flap breast reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015;31:636-42. DOI
11. Allen R, Guarda H, Wall F, Dupin C, Glass C. Free flap breast reconstruction: the LSU experience (1984-1996). Available from:
https://www.x-mol.com/paper/1212929277945520135?adv [Last accessed on 8 Jun 2023].
12. Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors and management of impending flap loss in
2138 breast free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2016;77:67-71. DOI
13. Kalmar CL, Drolet BC, Kassis S, et al. Breast Reconstruction free flap failure: does platelet count matter? Ann Plast Surg
2022;89:523-8. DOI PubMed
14. Kadle R, Cohen J, Hambley W, et al. A 35-year evolution of free flap-based breast reconstruction at a large urban academic center. J
Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32:147-52. DOI
15. Krüger-Genge A, Blocki A, Franke RP, Jung F. Vascular endothelial cell biology: an update. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:4411. DOI
PubMed PMC
16. Hanasono MM, Butler CE. Prevention and treatment of thrombosis in microvascular surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008;24:305-14.
DOI PubMed
17. Clemens MW, Kronowitz SJ. Current perspectives on radiation therapy in autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg
2015;4:222-31. DOI PubMed PMC
18. Ugurlu AM, Basat SO, Ceran F, Ozalp B, Berkoz O. The effects of limited adventitiectomy on vascular anastomosis: An experimental
study in rats. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;51:129-35. DOI PubMed
19. Stranix JT, Azoury SC, Lee ZH, et al. Matched comparison of microsurgical anastomoses performed with loupe magnification versus
operating microscope in traumatic lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:235-40. DOI
20. Serletti JM, Deuber MA, Guidera PM, et al. Comparison of the operating microscope and loupes for free microvascular tissue transfer.
Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:270-6. DOI
21. Alghoul MS, Gordon CR, Yetman R, et al. From simple interrupted to complex spiral: a systematic review of various suture techniques
for microvascular anastomoses. Microsurgery 2011;31:72-80. DOI
22. Arora R, Mishra KS, Bhoye HT, et al. Mechanical anastomotic coupling device versus hand-sewn venous anastomosis in head and
neck reconstruction-an analysis of 1694 venous anastomoses. Indian J Plast Surg 2021;54:118-23. DOI PubMed PMC
23. Grewal AS, Erovic B, Strumas N, Enepekides DJ, Higgins KM. The utility of the microvascular anastomotic coupler in free tissue
transfer. J Plastic Surgery 2012:20. DOI
24. Head LK, McKay DR. Economic comparison of hand-sutured and coupler-assisted microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg
2018;34:71-6. DOI PubMed
25. Spector JA, Draper LB, Levine JP, Ahn CY. Routine use of microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomosis in breast
reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:365-8. DOI PubMed
26. Shen AY, Lonie S, Lim K, et al. Free flap monitoring, salvage, and failure timing: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg
2021;37:300-8. DOI PubMed
27. Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Heine-Geldern A, Herter F, Broer PN. End-to-end versus end-to-side anastomoses in free flap
reconstruction: single centre experiences. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;51:362-5. DOI PubMed
28. Ahmadi I, Herle P, Miller G, et al. End-to-end versus end-to-side microvascular anastomosis: a meta-analysis of free flap outcomes. J
Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33:402-11. DOI PubMed
29. Zhang X, Mu D, Yang Y, et al. The value of BMI for breast reconstructions with the SIEA flaps: predicting the ideal intercostal plane
for the end-to-end microvascular anastomosis and the possibility of utilizing the TDA as a salvage recipient choice. Aesthetic Plast
Surg 2022;46:2742-52. DOI
30. Saint-Cyr M, Chang DW, Robb GL, Chevray PM. Internal mammary perforator recipient vessels for breast reconstruction using free
TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1769-73. DOI PubMed
31. Apostolides JG, Magarakis M, Rosson GD. Preserving the internal mammary artery: end-to-side microvascular arterial anastomosis for
DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:225e-32e. DOI PubMed
32. Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. Algorithm in choosing recipient vessels for perforator free flap in breast
reconstruction: the role of the internal mammary perforators. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57:258-65. DOI PubMed