Page 140 - Read Online

Page 12 of 14 Foppiani et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:53 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.137

this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions
Initiating and designing the study and drafting the protocol: Foppian JA, Hernandez Alvarez A, Weidman
A, Valentine L
Involved in the study design, optimizing the literature search, and resolving conflicts for the paper’s
inclusion: Foppian JA, Hernandez Alvarez A, Weidman A, Stearns S, Valentine L
Overseeing all aspects of study design and SR writing: Lin SJ

Availability of data and materials
All relevant information for this systematic review is either part of the manuscript, figures, tables and digital
supplemental content. Any additional information can be found on the PROSPERO protocol for this paper.
If any further information is required or unclear, the reader is more than welcome to contact the
corresponding author for clarification.

Financial supports and sponsorship
None.

Conflicts of interests
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.

Consent for publications
Not applicable.

Copyrights
© The Author(s) 2023.

REFERENCES
1. Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction:
experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1100-9. DOI PubMed
2. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice
of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:466-75; discussion 476-7. DOI PubMed
3. Chevray PM. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP
flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1077-83; discussion 1084-5. DOI PubMed
4. Ulusal BG, Cheng MH, Wei FC, Ho-Asjoe M, Song D. Breast reconstruction using the entire transverse abdominal adipocutaneous
flap based on unilateral superficial or deep inferior epigastric vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1395-403; discussion 1404-6.
DOI PubMed
5. Baltodano PA, Schalet G, Rezak K, et al. Early discontinuation of breast free flap monitoring: a strategy driven by national data. Plast
Reconstr Surg 2020;146:258e-64e. DOI
6. McLaughlin M, Porter BE, Cohen-Shohet R, Leyngold MM. Safety of coupled arterial anastomosis in autologous breast
reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021;37:132-5. DOI PubMed
7. Selber JC, Angel Soto-Miranda M, Liu J, Robb G. The survival curve: factors impacting the outcome of free flap take-backs. Plast
Reconstr Surg 2012;130:105-13. DOI PubMed
8. Mirzabeigi MN, Wang T, Kovach SJ, Taylor JA, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Free flap take-back following postoperative microvascular
compromise: predicting salvage versus failure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:579-89. DOI PubMed
9. Han M, Ochoa E, Zhu B, et al. Risk factors for and cost implications of free flap take-backs: a single institution review. Laryngoscope
2021;131:E1821-9. DOI
10. Odorico SK, Reuter Muñoz K, J Nicksic P, et al. Surgical and demographic predictors of free flap salvage after takeback: a systematic
review. Microsurgery 2023;43:78-88. DOI PubMed PMC