Page 139 - Read Online
P. 139

Foppiani et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:53  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.137   Page 11 of 14

               with  devices  costing  8,000-50,000  USD [39,40] . While  this  implies  that  the  cost  of  both  those  types
               of monitoring  is  similar,  the  newer  smartphone-based  monitoring  could  become  a  compelling  cost-
               efficient method.  Continuing  with  the  discussion  of  cost  efficiency,  another  important  factor  to
               consider is the economic burden that results from flap complications and flap loss. Complications
               associated  with autologous breast reconstruction are costly, with median costs for complications at 30
               days found to be an additional $7,197 USD and at one year found to be an additional $10,644 USD .
                                                                                                        [41]
               Therefore, the price of monitoring flap perfusion may ultimately be more cost-effective for the sake of
               avoiding eventual flap complications and loss while certainly preventing additional psychological burden
               on patients.


               Limitations
               While this is an original and pioneering study that aims to systematically review and compare the outcomes
               and complications of oximetric and thermographic flap monitoring for microvascular flap monitoring, it
               does have limitations. Given the specific type of outcome investigated and the paucity of experimental
               designs in this domain, it was not feasible to restrict study designs to only randomized controlled trials or
               case-control cohorts, resulting in high heterogenicity. The final patient population was thus retrieved largely
               from observational studies, which present biases inherent to their design (e.g., underreporting or
               information bias, and publication bias) and frequently incomplete data. This is a natural outcome when
               venturing into new territory and collecting data from multiple sources. Despite this limitation, our study
               represents a crucial first step in understanding the utility of thermography and oximetry for flap monitoring
               in microvascular breast reconstruction. Future research can build on our findings by comparing these
               monitoring techniques in a larger, more standardized patient cohort, with careful consideration of patient
               characteristics and comorbidities to enhance the rigor and precision of the comparison. Another significant
               limitation was the lack of consensus on what defines certain complications. For example, flap and skin
               necrosis were not reported in terms of area or percentage. Thus, some studies could have considered small
               defects while others may have chosen to only count larger areas of necrosis as a reportable complication.
               Furthermore, while postoperative monitoring can significantly impact outcomes, surgical experience, the
               volume of free flap performed in each institution, and variation in surgical technique can all have a major
               impact on complication rates. Lastly, it is important to note that a consensus on a unified cut-off indicating
               concern for a threatened flap when using oximetry or thermography should be established. Such a
               consensus could decrease heterogeneity within sub-groups and enable a more valid comparison of methods
               of breast flap monitoring.


               CONCLUSION
               Ultimately, this meta-analysis concludes that while oximetry monitoring currently has strong evidence for
               improving flap outcomes trends, the current data indicate that further studies may show that more updated,
               modern thermography is at least comparable to oximetry in achieving ideal patient outcomes. As of this
               systematic review, oximetry seems to be marginally superior to thermography and thus poses whether it
               would be valuable to put more resources into investigating thermographic monitoring techniques for
               microsurgical breast reconstruction. However, while outcomes themselves would not warrant further
               investigation, the emergent low-cost thermographic devices have the potential to improve cost-efficiency.
               Finally, this study highlights the importance of flap monitoring following microsurgical reconstruction of
               the breast and also encourages further cost analysis comparing thermography and oximetry.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgment
               We sincerely thank Victor Joao, affiliated with the Universidad De La Republica Uruguay, for his help as the
               active librarian for this project. He helped with creating search strategies and gathering the search results for
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144