Page 127 - Read Online
P. 127

Foppiani et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:53                                Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2022.137
                                                                                Aesthetic Research




               Meta-Analysis                                                                 Open Access



               Comparing microsurgical breast reconstruction
               outcomes following postoperative monitoring

               techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis
               of 2529 patients


                                              1,#
                                                                                                       1
                                                                         1
                              1,#
                                                                                       1
               Jose A. Foppiani , Lauren Valentine , Angelica Hernandez Alvarez , Allan Weidman , Stephen Stearns ,
                                                     4
                                       3
                          2
               Lacey Foster , Karthika Devi , Khaled Albakri , Samuel J. Lin 1
               1
                Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
               2
                Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
               3
                Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, TN 605107, India.
               4
                Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan.
               #
                Authors considered joint first authors.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Samuel J. Lin, Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical
               School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, MA 02215, USA. E-mail: sjlin@bidmc.harvard.edu
               How to cite this article: Foppiani JA, Valentine L, Hernandez Alvarez A, Weidman A, Stearns S, Foster L, Devi K, Albakri K, Lin SJ.
               Comparing microsurgical breast reconstruction outcomes following postoperative monitoring techniques: a systematic review
               and meta-analysis of 2529 patients. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:53. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.137
               Received: 30 Nov 2022  First Decision: 8 Aug 2023  Revised: 21 Aug 2023  Accepted: 4 Sep 2023  Published: 18 Sep 2023
               Academic Editors: Gordon Kwanlyp Lee, Raffaele Rauso  Copy Editor: Dan Zhang   Production Editor: Dan Zhang
               Abstract
               Aims: This paper aims to assess the existing evidence regarding oximetry and thermography by comparing
               postoperative rates of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction.

               Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane was completed. A qualitative and
               quantitative analysis of all included studies was then performed.

               Results: Fourteen studies were included with a total population of 2,529 female patients who underwent
               microvascular breast reconstruction, ultimately totaling 3,289 flaps. The mean age for the cohorts included in this
               study ranged from 48.9 to 57 years of age. A total of 15 complete flap losses were reported. Furthermore, this
               meta-analysis of proportion showed that total flap loss experienced was 0% (95%CI 0%-100%) for patients
               monitored with thermography compared to 0% (95%CI 0%-1%) for those monitored with oximetry. Partial flap
               loss occurred at a frequency of 1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0%-73%] for patients monitored with





                           © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                            www.parjournal.net
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132