Page 123 - Read Online
P. 123

Chin et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:52  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2023.44  Page 11 of 14

               and applied to patients undergoing breast reconstruction. While qualitative studies have examined
               embodiment following mastectomy and breast reconstruction, further research is needed to measure the
               dimensions of breast embodiment, including ownership, body representation, sensation, posture, and
               psychosocial outcomes. Studies in the prosthetics literature may serve as a guide for applying these
               measures to breast reconstruction outcomes. The breast embodiment framework builds upon existing
               patient-reported outcome measures and expands the plastic surgeon’s tools for evaluating patients’
               experiences following reconstruction. Beyond post-mastectomy reconstruction, the embodiment framework
               may also be useful in outcome evaluations of other reconstructive surgeries, such as gender-affirming
               surgery.


               DECLARATIONS
               Author’s contributions
               Concept and design: Dingle AM, Chin MG, Eftekari SC, Moura SP, Donnelly DAT, Shaffrey EC, Sears L
               Literature review and analysis of data: Chin MG
               Drafting of the manuscript: Chin MG
               Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Chin MG, Eftekari SC, Moura SP,
               Donnelly DAT, Shaffrey EC, Sears L, Dingle AM


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Jonczyk MM, Jean J, Graham R, Chatterjee A. Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12
                   year analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;173:267-74.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               2.       Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:7S-13S.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
               3.       Davies CF, Macefield R, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Potter S. Patient-reported outcome measures for post-mastectomy breast
                   reconstruction: a systematic review of development and measurement properties. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:386-404.  DOI  PubMed
                   PMC
               4.       Homsy A, Rüegg E, Montandon D, Vlastos G, Modarressi A, Pittet B. Breast reconstruction: a century of controversies and progress.
                   Ann Plast Surg 2018;80:457-63.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Hanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with breast cancer after breast conservation vs mastectomy
                   and reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2022;157:e220631.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               6.       Rosenberg SM, Dominici LS, Gelber S, et al. Association of breast cancer surgery with quality of life and psychosocial well-being in
                   young breast cancer survivors. JAMA Surg 2020;155:1035-42.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               7.       Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128