Page 72 - Read Online
P. 72

Page 10 of 13            Titolo et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2023;10:21  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2022.113

               formation; in injuries older than 6 months, reconstruction techniques can still be undertaken.


               For mixed/motor nerve injuries, instead, the authors recommend immediate repair (within 24 hours of
               injury) when possible, because motor end-plate degradation limits the amount of time available for any
               functional motor return. For the same reason, in case of delayed presentation (more than 6 months after
               complete transection), efforts should be taken to provide axons to the muscle end-plates no later than 1 year
               and a multifactorial approach, including nerve grafting, nerve transfer, and/or tendon transfer is suggested
               to restore function .
                               [70]

               Beyond this time period, it seems unrealistic to expect nerve surgery to work; when the degeneration of the
               motor end-plates, muscle atrophy, and replacement of muscle fibers by fatty tissue occurs, tendon transfer
                                                              [53]
               surgery becomes the only possible surgical treatment  . Due to different structure characteristics, it has
               been shown that functional sensory recovery may be achievable several years after complete transection, but
               the results are less predictable [64,71] .


               CONCLUSION
               Functional recovery in hand nerve defect treatment is gradually improving in recent years. A deeper
               knowledge of innervation anatomical patterns combined with a classification language widely shared by
               specialists has provided great advantages in recognizing and guiding surgical treatment of patients whose
               quality of life would otherwise be compromised. Regarding surgical options, microsurgical direct nerve
               repair is still the gold standard for peripheral nerve repair whenever a tension-free and early repair are
               possible. It should be remembered, however, that nerve repair requires healthy supportive tissue to achieve
               optimal results. If there is a large nerve defect, an autologous nerve graft is accepted as the gold standard
               procedure.

               Treatment of small nerve gaps is still an area of intense scientific research, but at the present time, no
               method has been proven superior to others; several elements, such as each technique’s feature, surgical
               experience, and clinical setting, must be evaluated. Numerous alternatives in nerve injury management have
               been provided by the advantages granted by nerve transfer procedures, and in some cases, a combination of
               nerve repair and immediate tendon transfer may lead to an early function recovery. Finally, when nerve
               surgery cannot be considered a solution, secondary surgery, such as tendon transfer procedures, still plays a
               significant role in improving the patient's hand function.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Concept and design: Titolo P, Fanecco A
               Data acquisition, data analysis, manuscript preparation: Fanecco A
               Critical revision and completion of manuscript: Titolo P


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77