Page 50 - Read Online
P. 50

Page 6 of 7          Montabone et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2019;6:7  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2019.09

                                                               [20]
               greater for IgG (88%-98%) compared to IgM (50%-62%) . False positives due to cross-reaction are highly
               improbable being about 2%-5% for Epstein Barr/Cytomegalovirus, and 20%-50% for Coxiella burnetii/
                                                            [21]
               non-henselae bartonellosis (very rare in our country) . IgM presence allows to date back infection to the
               previous 3 months, whereas IgG remains detectable in the 25% of patients one year later.

               Finally, we observed full clinical and instrumental recovery after specific antibiotic and steroid therapy. In
               a retrospective study on 74 CSD patients with ocular disease, 44 were treated with antibiotics alone, 17 with
               antibiotics and steroids (both intravenous high dose metil-prednisolone or oral prednisone), 2 with steroids
               alone and 11 patients didn’t receive any treatment. Visual acuity improvement occurred in 50% of the
                                                                                                   [10]
               patients treated with antibiotics alone, and in 87.5% treated with both antibiotics and corticosteroids .
               The combination of doxycycline and steroids shorten the course of disease and accelerate visual recovery
                                                        [22]
               compared to natural history of illness in our case . No side effects were reported.
               CSD neuroretinitis is a rare clinical condition that must be considered in young patient with rapidly
               progressive unilateral visual loss. It requires a prompt neuro-ophthalmological evaluation in order to
               establish the correct diagnosis and start an early specific treatment.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to realization of this case report: Montabone C, Vecchio D, Vujosevic S
               Reviewed the case as well as the manuscript, providing substantial contribution to discussion and
               conclusion: De Cillà S, Cantello R

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The patient gave written informed consent.

               Consent for publication
               The patient gave written informed consent for publication. All clinical information submitted is anonymous
               and the patient is not recognizable from the iconographic material.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Purvin V, Sundaram S, Kawasaki A. Neuroretinitis: review of the literature and new observations. J Neuroophtalmol 2011;31:58-68.
               2.   Touitou V, LeHoang P. Diagnostic approach in optic neuropathy. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2012;168:691-6.
               3.   Kahloun R, Abroug N, Ksiaa I, Mahmoud A, Zeghidi H, et al. Infectious optic neuropathies: a clinical update. Eye Brain 2015;7:59-81.
               4.   Mabra D, Yeh S, Shantha JG. Ocular manifestations of bartonellosis. Curr Opin Ophtalmol 2018;29:582-7.
               5.   Cunningham ET, Kochner JE. Ocular bartonellosis. Am J Opthalmol 2000;130: 340-9.
               6.   Murakami K, Tsukahara M, Tsuneoka H, Iino H, Ishida C, et al. Cat scratch disease: analysis of 130 sieropositive cases. J Infect
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55