Page 143 - Read Online
P. 143

Alsulihem et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2019;6:13  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2019.007       Page 9 of 13

               urodynamic evaluation 2-3 months after the first injection and then if there is a change of clinical course
               and recurrence of symptoms despite recent injection [12,40] .


               Sacral nerve stimulation
               Several retrospective and observational studies have evaluated the role of dorsal rhizotomy (sacral
               deafferentation S2-S4/5), combined with anterior sacral root stimulation in the treatment of NDO [42-45] . This
               treatment has been shown to effectively reduce elevated detrusor pressure, improve compliance, increase
               bladder capacity, improve urinary incontinence, and achieve voluntary bladder and bowel emptying in
               patients with complete SCI [41-44] . This technique has a variable success rate in specialized centers but is
               limited by long-term complications and a high rate of surgical revision. It might be offered by experienced
               centers and in highly selected patients as a third-line option after failure of previous medical and minimally
               invasive options [8,13] .

               Surgical treatment of NDO
               Surgical treatment options are considered when all medical and minimally invasive treatment options have
               failed to eliminate poor urodynamic parameters [Table 1]. Surgical options include bladder augmentation
               and urinary diversion.

               Bladder augmentation, using a bowel segment, should be considered in patients who failed all medical
               and minimally invasive management for reduced bladder capacity and NDO [8,13] . It can eliminate urinary
               incontinence in 75%-100%, improve bladder compliance in 69%-100%, and improve quality of life in
                             [8]
               90% of patients . The addition of a continent catheterizable channel might be considered if the patient
               cannot catheterize through the urethra [8,46] . Contraindications to performing bladder augmentation
               include bladder malignancy, Chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance less than 40 mL/min),
               bowel disease, previous significant bowel resection, inability to do CISC (such as quadriplegia), or
               unwillingness to perform CISC [8,46] . Long term complications include bladder stone formation, metabolic
               complications, intraperitoneal bladder perforation, urosepsis, vesicoureteric reflux, recurrence of NDO and
               adenocarcinoma or urothelial carcinoma in up to 6% [8,46-48] . Therefore, lifelong surveillance with cystoscopy
               is recommended. In case of recurrence of incontinence, video urodynamic is recommended, and in the
               presence of NDO, treatment with Botox injection into the augmented bladder can be tried before surgical
                                        [49]
               revision or urinary diversion .

               Urinary diversion, is considered as last resort option in the management of NDO if the patient is unfit or
               not a candidate for bladder augmentation. Urinary diversion options include continent and incontinent
                       [46]
               diversion .
               Continent urinary diversion with continent catheterizable channels is performed when the patient can
               catheterize but cannot use native bladder due to a severely contracted bladder with severe vesicoureteral
               reflux or devastated bladder outlet, or bladder malignancy [8,47] . It carries a higher risk of long-term
               metabolic complications. It is contraindicated in patients with chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance
               less than 40 mL/min) and in a patient who are not fit for CISC [8,48] .


               Incontinent urinary diversion is a last resort option [8,13,49] , in which urine is diverted to the skin by using
               bowel segment (usually ileum) in patients who cannot perform CISC and in patients who are unfit
               or failed other surgical options [8,13,46] . An ileal conduit is a familiar procedure to urologists, the most
               commonly performed incontinent urinary diversion procedure, and the preferred incontinent urinary
               diversion procedure [8,46,50] . It results in renal function preservation in 88% to more than 90% of patients [8,50] .
               Possible complications include ureteral anastomotic stenosis, stomal or incisional hernia, stomal stenosis,
               bowel obstruction, urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis, urine leak, urolithiasis, and metabolic
                                                                                  [8]
               complications (acidosis) [46,51] . Overall major complications can reach up to 11% .
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148