Page 121 - Read Online
P. 121

Page 6 of 19                 Wang et al. Microbiome Res Rep. 2025;4:23  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.94



















































                          Figure 1. Overview of the proposed DNA spike-in procedure, compared with other quantification methods.

               maternal and infant fecal samples. Accurate documentation of the mother and infant sample weights and
               elution buffer volumes during DNA extraction is crucial [Supplementary Table 1]. Following DNA
               extraction, a specified quantity of spike-in DNA was added to each sample's DNA, after which library
               preparation was undertaken. Given the predetermined number of rRNA copies added, this served as a back-
               normalization factor for accurately determining the absolute abundance of all other organisms present
               within the sample.


               The spike-in bacteria correlate well with microbial loads
               To validate the accuracy and reliability of the DNA spike-in method for estimating microbial loads, we
               examined the correlation between the spike-in bacterial read counts and the total microbial loads across
               different samples. Figure 2 illustrates the relationship between the read counts of the spike-in bacteria
               Pseudoalteromonas and Planococcus and the total copy number obtained from the spike-in as calculated
               from the weight of DNA added from the sample. The analysis shows an inverse correlation between the
               read count assigned to a spike-in operational taxonomic unit (OTU) and the total copy number from the
               spike-in method. For Planococcus, the correlation coefficient was r = -0.83, indicating a strong negative
               correlation (P = 0.0008174). Similarly, for Pseudoalteromonas, the correlation coefficient was found to be r =
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126