Page 62 - Read Online
P. 62

Jiang et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:47  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.12  Page 15 of 20

               some are DSS-induced mouse models and some are knockout mouse models - and the different amounts of
               Akk administrated. In addition, there are differences in the specificity of the strains used: different strains of
               the same species may have opposite effects in the same disease. Most current studies on Akk are limited to
               the model strain isolated in 2004, ATCC BAA-835T. However, another newly isolated strain of Akk in 2017
               has been shown to exacerbate colitis in IL-10 /  mice. In addition, a study in 2019 reported differences in
                                                      - -
               anti-inflammatory function between Akk BAA-835T and mouse-derived Akk strain 139. Therefore, the
               strain specificity of Akk may also be the main reason for the different results of different experiments. The
               pro-inflammatory effect of lipid components of Akk has recently been discovered. As membrane
               phospholipids from Akk can induce BMDCs to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α in a
                                     [109]
               TLR2-dependent manner . Furthermore, similar to intestinal inflammation, the role of Akk in CRC is
               controversial. A recent study in 2022 found that receiving Akk administration exacerbated the development
               of colitis-associated CRC in AOM/DSS-induced model mice, as evidenced by shorter colon length, more
                                                         [110]
               severe weight loss, and more intestinal tumors . There are multiple possible reasons to explain the
               differences in the results of different experiments. First, the viability of Akk, the frequency of administration,
               and the number of bacteria, all affect Akk colonization and CRC development. Furthermore, the role of Akk
               may be different in different CRC models. The classical AOM/DSS-induced CRC model was chosen in this
               study in 2022, which may be different from the spontaneous CRC models such as APC /  mice in other
                                                                                          min +
               studies. More studies are required in the future to explore and confirm the role of Akk in intestinal tumors
               and intestinal inflammation. In addition, future studies on Akk should pay detailed attention to the strains
               and evaluation of the probiotic effect of each type of Akk strain. So far, there is still a lack of relevant
               research on whether Akk has adverse effects on intestinal functional diseases and metabolic diseases. In this
               context, the probiotic role of Akk in intestinal-related diseases and its specific mechanisms need to be
               explored further in the future.


               CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE
               In summary, as a paradigm in the new generation of probiotics, the colonization of Akk in the intestine is
               closely related to maintaining intestinal homeostasis. It plays a critical role in the progression and treatment
               design of intestinal inflammation, cancer, and other diseases caused by intestinal disorders, such as liver
               diseases and diabetes. While the majority of research indicates the beneficial effects of Akk treatment, some
               studies suggest it may exacerbate disease progression. This discrepancy could be attributed to variations
               across studies, such as differing disease models, the distinct intestinal environments in which Akk operates,
               the activity levels of various Akk strains, or the specific components of Akk used. It is worth mentioning that
               the extracellular vesicles and proteins of Akk are increasingly well studied, and studies have shown that
               these components may be more protective when used alone than active organisms, which is more suitable
               for clinical applications. In addition, pasteurized intact Akk cells are considered safe for human
               consumption and thus are suitable for clinical application. They have been shown to be as effective or even
               more effective than living cells in the treatment of metabolic disorders. Therefore, it is of interest to
               continue exploring the pasteurized cells, extracellular vesicles, and bacterial outer membrane fractions of
               Akk to extract and utilize the fractions that play an important role. Furthermore, studies on the brain-gut
               axis and lung-gut axis have been emerging in recent years, and in addition to metabolic and liver diseases,
               the association between intestinal homeostasis and other systemic diseases is gaining more attention, and
               future studies may explore the role of Akk in other diseases in the future. In conclusion, as a potential
               probiotic, Akk is stably colonized in the intestine, and there is substantial evidence of its positive effects on
               intestinal-related diseases. Further evaluation of Akk’s safety, or the development of its active ingredient for
               targeted drug delivery, could pave the way for its clinical application as a therapeutic agent. Additionally,
               probiotic enzymes could be defined as prokaryotic isoenzymes from intestinal bacteria, which catalyze
               eukaryotic targets from host cells and function as potential drugs. As probiotic enzymes from Akk, both
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67