Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Boyajian et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:29  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.05  Page 25 of 35

                                                        [193]
               increasing  energy  expenditure,  respectively . Additionally,  many  lactic  acid  bacteria  produce
               antimicrobial peptides (AMPs; e.g., bacteriocins) that are able to avert pathogenic bacteria associated with
               obesity and aging [241,242] . Moreover, bacterial-derived exopolysaccharides (EPS) have gained interest as
                                                                                                   [244]
                                                           [243]
               prebiotics and demonstrated anti-obesogenic effects , likely via intestinal microbiota modulation . EPS
               from L. acidophilus, L. gasseri, L. plantarum, and L. rhamnosus show significant health-promoting benefits,
               including antioxidant properties in an aging mouse model and antitumor activity . Overall, there are
                                                                                       [245]
               numerous postbiotics that can be studied and leveraged as novel therapeutics based on their action.
               Currently, available evidence suggests that many postbiotics have great promise as therapeutics for obesity
               and aging, warranting additional exploration.


               Limitations of biotic therapeutics and their investigation
               Although hopeful, the use of the microbiome, probiotics, synbiotics, and other biotic forms as next-
               generation therapeutics faces many obstacles. Our diverse ecosystem is home to a near-infinite number of
               microbes and natural polyphenols with potential prebiotic activity, although not yet discovered. This
               provides a great opportunity but also necessitates procedures for researching such materials. For pre- and
               probiotics already identified and studied, guidelines on therapeutic dosages are lacking. Similarly,
               determining how best to combine different probiotics and create synbiotic formulations for maximal
                                       [193]
               synergy remains unknown . The lack of consensus may be partly attributed to the various research
               methods used to study biotics, as well as the wide range of agents studied. Biotic-focused studies can be
               improved for future studies. For example, quercetin alone may be investigated as an aging therapy without
               the addition of Dasatinib. Importantly, pre-clinical and clinical trials of biotics should standardize the
               analysis of the gut microbiota as a study outcome. This can also be extended to observational studies on
               obese and aged populations to help reach a consensus on gut microbiota alterations associated with these
               diseases. Methods for the collection and analysis of microbiota samples must also be standardized. Many
               animal studies isolate microbiota from intestinal tissue samples, while clinical trials rely on fecal samples.
               These differences may contribute to the high variability seen in the published data on gut microbial
               composition. Moreover, many of the recent clinical trials for obesity and aging were conducted in Asia,
               which may not be applicable to the Western populations, given the different gut microbiota among these
               regions. In addition, variability in diet and exercise can impact results from clinical trials that investigate
               biotic therapies. The diagnostic criteria for overweight or obese also vary between studies, as does the
               criteria for an elderly age. Standardization of such factors would provide more widely applicable data.
               Moreover, to our knowledge, there are no clinical trials on the sarcopenic obese population. The shortage of
               clinical studies is a leading limitation for the translation of biotic therapies. The majority of the reviewed
               clinical trials had a treatment duration of three months, which does not reflect the safety of biotic therapies.
               Long-term investigation of biotic supplementation is therefore warranted. In addition, the investigation of
               biotics with therapeutic effects for obesity should be considered as a treatment for aging studies, and vice
               versa. Such studies would advance understanding of the link between obesity and aging and may discover
               biotics that can be used for both diseases. Overall, additional short- and long-term human trials
               investigating different biotics for general health and disease states, such as obesity, unhealthy aging, and
               sarcopenic obesity, are required to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of the various biotic forms.


               CONCLUSION
               The abundance of microorganisms that inhabit the human body and their critical roles in human health and
               disease present unlimited potential for microbiome-engineered therapeutics. Obesity and aging are complex
               diseases that are together rising in prevalence, increasing the global risk of debilitating and chronic illnesses.
               Many hallmarks are shared between obesity and aging, one of which is gut microbial dysbiosis. The gut
               microbiota may be targeted to re-establish a healthy flora in obese or aged individuals, thereby improving
               the disease phenotypes, underlying metabolic dysfunction and systemic comorbidities. Importantly, the
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78