Page 116 - Read Online
P. 116

Varming et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:15  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2023.50  Page 5 of 16

               METHODS
               Protein expression and purification
               TP901-1 CI-NTD was expressed and purified as in . Briefly, BL21(DE3) E.coli was transformed with
                                                             [24]
               pET30a(+) with kanamycin resistance encoding a synthetic gene for CI-NTD (residues 1-89 with a
               C-terminal His-tag, see construct list in Table 1). 10 mL lysogeny broth (LB) medium starter cultures were
               grown for 16 h, and used to inoculate 1 L of LB medium expression cultures (50 g/mL kanamycin). A final
               concentration of 1 mM isopropylthio-β-galactoside was added when the culture had reached an optical
               density (OD) of 0.5-0.6. Growth was continued overnight at 25 °C prior to harvesting the soluble fraction
               after sonication in lysis buffer (20 mM imidazole, 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 M NaCl).


               Protein was purified on an ÄKTA Purifier system (GE HealthCare/Cytiva), first by immobilizing on a 1 mL
               His-Trap™ HP (Cytiva) in lysis buffer, followed by a short wash in the same. Protein was eluted with 20 mM
               Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 500 mM Imidazole, pH 7.5. A final purification step was carried out by Size-Exclusion
               Chromatography on a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 column with 20 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl pH 7.5 as
               eluent.


               Φ13 CI and φ13 Mor with N-terminal His tags (sequences in Supplementary Table 1) were produced as φ13
                    [28]
               CI in , following basically the same procedure as above. All synthetic genes were from Genscript and
               codon-optimized.

               Protein concentration was determined using A  measured with a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV/Vis
                                                            280
               spectrophotometer using the estimated absorption coefficient calculated from the sequence using the
               Expasy Protparam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/). Protein was concentrated using Amicon Ultra
               3kDa cutoff filters and stored frozen at -20 °C.


               Crystal structure determination of CI-NTD
               Using the sitting-drop vapor diffusion technique, a JCSG+ screen (Qiagen) was set up for the TP901-1 CI
               NTD protein (buffer: 20 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl pH 7.5). The Oryx 8 Protein Crystallization Robot
               (Douglas Instruments Ltd.) was used to set up the screen at room temperature in MRC2 Well
               Crystallization plates (SwissCI). The stock protein concentration used was 8.14 mg/mL. In each well, there
               was a reservoir volume of 100 µL (screen solution) and sitting drops of 0.3 µL The protein:reservoir ratio
               was 3:1 in the top drop and 1:1 in the bottom. For optimization, 2D grids for four chosen conditions were
               also set up using sitting drop vapor diffusion at room temperature. The crystals sent to the synchrotron
               were produced in the optimized condition consisting of 28% w/v PEG 4000, 0.17 M ammonium sulfate, and
               15% glycerol. The protein concentration in this optimized condition was 3.3 mg/mL in 20 mM Tris pH 7.5,
               100 mM NaCl (protein stock), and the protein: reservoir ratio was 3:1 in the top drop and 1:1 in the bottom,
               and the drop volume was 0.4 µL. Crystals were frozen in liquid nitrogen directly in mother liquor without
               the addition of cryoprotectant. X-ray diffraction data were collected at beamline ID23-2 ESRF, Grenoble,
               France. One of the datasets with 1.29 Å resolution was chosen to determine the structure. The previous
               TP901-1 CI-NTD structure (PDB code:3ZHI) was chosen as the reference structure to do the Molecular
               replacement  in  the  CCP4  suite   (MOLREP ).  Further  refinement  was  performed  alternating
                                                         [31]
                                             [30]
                                                                              [33]
               computational refinement in REFMAC5  and manual rounds in COOT  until reaching a final R factor
                                                  [32]
               value of 14.97% and an R free value of 18.29%. Data statistics of X-ray diffraction and structure refinement
               statistics are shown in Table 2.
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121