Page 785 - Read Online
P. 785

Stolz et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:76  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.69                                        Page 11 of 14

               Since patients with PMR have severe structural pathologies of the MV, leaflet configuration seems to be
               more important compared to SMR patients. Therefore, we recommend stricter separation of SMR and PMR
               etiology within studies, as well as differentiating “sub-etiologies” of SMR (ischemic MR, non-ischemic
               MR, ASMR, and HFmrEF-SMR), which could be done by multi-center pooling of data. A prerequisite is
               comprehensive guideline-recommended echocardiographic assessments of cardiac anatomy and function,
               also including the right heart and pulmonary vasculature. This integrated approach is challenging but
               would facilitate further understanding of pathophysiology and outcome in a diversity of SMR subtypes
               undergoing TMVr, thereby improving patient selection and procedural MR reduction to achieve optimal
               outcome after TMVr.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Drafting of conceptual and methodologic framework: Stolz L, Orban M, Hausleiter J, Orban M
               Manuscript writing: Stolz L, Orban M, Orban M
               Manuscript review: Braun D, Nabauer M, Hagl C, Massberg S, Hausleiter J

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               This work was supported by Klinikum der Universität München.

               Conflicts of interest
               Martin Orban has received speaker honoraria from SedanaMedical, AstraZeneca and Bayer Vital. Michael
               Nabauer, Mathias Orban and Daniel Braun have received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Jörg
               Hausleiter has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. The other
               authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Asgar AW, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure: pathophysiology, prognosis, and therapeutic
                   considerations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1231-48.
               2.   Boudoulas KD, Vallakati A, Pitsis AA, Orsinelli DA, Abraham WT. The use of MitraClip in secondary mitral regurgitation and
                   heart failure. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2020:S1553-
                   8389(20)30262-1.
               3.   Goel K, Barker CM, Lindenfeld J. Contemporary management of secondary mitral regurgitation. Eur Cardiol 2020;15:e22.
               4.   Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from
                   the American society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc
                   Echocardiogr 2017;30:303-71.
               5.   Chehab O, Roberts-Thomson R, Ng Yin Ling C, et al. Secondary mitral regurgitation: pathophysiology, proportionality and prognosis.
                   Heart 2020;106:716-23.
               6.   Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, et al; EVEREST II Investigators. Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral
                   regurgitation: 5-year results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2844-54.
   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790