Page 454 - Read Online
P. 454

Page 8 of 9                                        Scotti et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:49  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.38

               with advanced HF, it can act as a “bridge” for further invasive treatments (e.g., HTx or MCS) for others.
               It must be clear that the final goal to perform such interventions in this setting of patients is no longer
               reducing mortality of course, but to enhance and/or stabilize the clinical status (mainly by reductions of
               sPAP) and thus the quality of life while awaiting HTx. Consequently, obtaining a symptomatic benefit
               increases the chances of reaching HTx in a good enough clinical status. More research efforts need to be
               spent to understand who will more likely benefit from percutaneous mitral valve repair at this stage of the
               HF. Currently, it is recommended to early refer patients affected by advanced HF to tertiary care centers
               that can best individualize treatment options (HTx, MCS and bridging solutions) and assure the proper
               timing for their application.


               CONCLUSION
               MitraClip implantation in advanced HF patients with concomitant severe MR is safe and can provide
               significant clinical improvement. Available evidence describes the favorable outcomes obtained with
               this device resulting in BTT, BTC or BTR. Further studies are needed to investigate the predictors of
               success for this procedure in this extreme setting of patients in order to provide solid basis for treatment
               recommendations.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Scotti A, Godino C
               Provided final revision and administrative support: Margonato A


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011;8:162-72.
               2.   Sannino A, Smith RL, Schiattarella GG, Trimarco B, Esposito G, et al. Survival and cardiovascular outcomes of patients with secondary
                   mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:1130-9.
               3.   Godino C, Scotti A, Taramasso M, Adamo M, Russo M, et al. Two-year cardiac mortality after MitraClip treatment of functional mitral
                   regurgitation in ischemic and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2018;269:33-9.
               4.   Goliasch G, Bartko PE, Pavo N, Neuhold S, Wurm R, et al. Refining the prognostic impact of functional mitral regurgitation in chronic
                   heart failure. Eur Heart J 2018;39:39-46.
               5.   Adamo M, Godino C, Giannini C, Scotti A, Liga R, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodelling predicts long-term outcomes in patients
   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459